My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2017 8:17:26 AM
Creation date
5/18/2017 3:43:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/22/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
386
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />$110.0 million for the Safety Plan, totaling $194.2 million. As the table below shows, the <br />total unfunded liability is projected to grow to $255.0 million as of June 30, 2017. <br /> <br /> <br />Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (millions) <br /> <br /> Miscellaneous Safety <br /> 6/30/15 Projected <br />6/30/17 <br />6/30/15 Projected <br />6/30/17 <br />Actuarial Accrued Liability $282.3 $317.0 $327.8 $371.0 <br />Market Value of Assets $198.1 $206.0 $217.8 $227.0 <br />Unfunded AAL $ 84.2 $111.0 $110.0 $144.0 <br /> <br />Funded Ratio 70% 65% 66% 61% <br /> <br />The unfunded liability primarily is related to retired or inactive1 employees: 61% of the <br />unfunded liability for the Miscellaneous Plan is associated with retired or inactive <br />employees, and 70% of the unfunded liability for the safety plan is associated with <br />retired or inactive employees. The General Fund’s share of the total unfunded liability is <br />approximately $152.5 million, or 78.5 percent. <br /> <br />The City’s unfunded liability reflects two primary factors: pension commitments made to <br />now-retired employees under inaccurate assumptions, and decisions by CalPERS to <br />amortize investment losses over a long period of time. Assumptions that turned out to <br />be inaccurate include lower-than-anticipated investment returns, longer-than-anticipated <br />lifespans, and underestimating the cost of benefit enhancements negotiated in the past. <br />Past investment losses were amortized over a 30-year period, which had the positive <br />benefit of limiting annual contribution increases, but which did not adequately pay down <br />unfunded liabilities. As a result, the City now needs to substantially increase annual <br />payments to CalPERS to fully fund benefits. <br /> <br />In order to assess the City’s long-term pension obligations, the City engaged John <br />Bartel, President, Bartel Associates, LLC, to model the actuarial valuations of the City’s <br />pension plans over the next thirty years. Mr. Bartel’s projections illustrate that the City’s <br />annual contributions will increase significantly. <br /> <br />For example, the City’s annual PERS payment in FY 2021-22 is projected to be <br />approximately $33.0 million, $13.4 million more than it is today, a 68 percent increase. <br />Costs are expected to continue to grow through FY 2030-31, when annual costs will be <br />more than double what they are today. These projections are at a 50 percent <br />confidence level, meaning there is a 50 percent likelihood that the cost could be lower, <br />and a 50 percent likelihood that the cost could be higher. <br /> <br /> <br />1 Inactive employees are employees who have earned benefits based on their service to <br />the City but are not currently employed by or retired from the City of Redwood City <br />9.A. - Page 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.