My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2017 8:17:26 AM
Creation date
5/18/2017 3:43:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/22/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
386
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 6 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />Whether to add additional funds to the Trust in future fiscal years would require an <br />annual evaluation, and depend upon the City’s year-end budget position and overall <br />financial outlook. Making a substantial contribution to the Trust now provides the <br />greatest opportunity for investment earnings over time, and more significant leverage in <br />paying future pension contributions. <br /> <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The City Council has previously directed that staff develop strategies to address <br />unfunded liabilities such as future pension obligations. An alternative to establishing a <br />Section 115 Trust would be to make additional payments directly to CalPERS. One <br />benefit of this approach is that the City would be credited with the CalPERS’ assumed <br />ROR. Today, this is 7.5 percent, though it will decrease to 7 percent by FY 2019-20 as <br />previously described in this report. Under CalPERS practices, additional contributions <br />would be applied evenly over a period of time. This means the City would receive an <br />even amount of rate relief over a long period, including in years in which the City had <br />sufficient resources to fund the required annual payments. <br /> <br />The primary drawbacks to making additional contributions directly to CalPERS are that <br />the City would have less flexibility, as the City would not control the investment <br />approach or the timing of when funds would be applied. <br /> <br />Should the Council prefer to make a payment directly to CalPERS rather than establish <br />a Section 115 Trust, staff would still recommend making this contribution by depositing <br />the fund balance that exceeds the 15 percent reserve. <br /> <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />The initial deposit to the trust would come from the General Fund at FY 2016-17 year- <br />end, and is dependent upon the fiscal year-end closing results. The amount of funding <br />would be based upon maintaining a 15 percent General Fund reserve, and allocating <br />any monies over the 15 percent threshold to the Trust. Staff’s preliminary estimates <br />indicate the initial Trust deposit could be approximately $7.8 million to $8.8 million. <br /> <br />Establishing the Section 115 Trust Program to pre-fund pension obligations has no <br />direct fiscal impact other than the ongoing fees charged by the Trust administrator and <br />each of the respective trustees. The total combined administrative, trustee, and <br />investment management fees start at 0.50 percent for assets between $5.0 and $10.0 <br />million. The fees would be paid from the Trust assets. A deposit of $7.8 million would <br />incur annual fees of $39,000, and a deposit of $8.8 million would incur annual fees of <br />$44,000. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />9.A. - Page 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.