Res17 15588 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

05/22/2017 a. The Project and improvements proposed by Downtown Planned Community permit DPC2015-011 are consistent with, conform to the intent of, and will appropriately implement the Downtown Precise Plan; and b. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the project and improvements proposed by Downtown Planned Community permit DPC2015- 011 will not, under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety peace, morals, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the project, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood of the project, or to the general welfare of the City, because the project has been found to be consistent with the community goals established in the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and c. With the exception of the reduced vehicular parking ratio and parking reduction pursuant to provisions in State Density Bonus law and the DTPP respectively, the Project and improvements otherwise comply fully with all applicable standards of the DTPP; and d. The Project and improvements comply with all but fifteen (15) Guidelines of the DTPP. The aspects of the Project which do not conform to the Guidelines of the DTPP (which are recommended and not mandatory), including the rear yard size, nonetheless adequately promote the overall intent of the DTPP. e. The Project and improvements will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of the historic resources at 620 Jefferson Avenue, 605 Middlefield Road, and 611 Middlefield Road; and, that the historic resources will remain eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Places. Section 4. Tentative Map TM2015-007: The City Council finds that: a. The map, design, and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the City of Redwood City's General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, Downtown Precise Plan, and all applicable subdivision improvements requirements; b. The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suited forthe type and density of the proposed development; c. The design and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife or their habitat, or cause serious public health problems; and El. The design and proposed improvements of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. Section 5. Condominium Permit TM2015-007: The City Council finds that the Project as proposed complies with the requirements of Article XI of the Subdivision Ordinance. Section 6. Planned Development Permit PD2016-006: The City Council finds that the project will provide an environment of physical and functional desirability, in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and Downtown Precise Plan area. Section 7. Density Bonus Parking Ratio and DTPP Parking Reduction: The City Council finds that: ATTY/RESO.0048/CC RE50 612 JEFFERSON (HABITAT) APPEAL RESO. NO. 15588 REV: 05-23-17 VR MUFF NO. 603 Page 4 of 22