My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-06-26 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-06-26 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:53:14 PM
Creation date
6/22/2017 4:17:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/26/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
646
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA <br />Cost of Services (User Fee) Study <br />Matrix Consulting Group Page 3 <br />Department / <br />Division <br />FY16 Fee-Related <br />Revenue1 <br />FY17 Annual Fee- <br />Related Cost2 <br />Surplus / <br />(Deficit) <br />Current Cost <br />Recovery <br />Percentage <br />Parks & Recreation $288,467 $252,143 $36,324 114% <br />Public Works $185,344 $186,344 $(1,000) 99% <br />TOTAL $511,719 $688,081 $(176,362) 74% <br /> <br /> The City is currently at a 74% cost recovery level, or under-recovers its fee- <br />related costs by approximately $176,000 for the four service areas examined, with the <br />largest deficit associated with Library Rentals. While the detailed documentation of the <br />Study will show an over-collection in some divisions and / or certain fees (on a per unit <br />basis), and an undercharge for others, overall, the City is providing an annual subsidy to <br />fee payers for all services included in the fee study. <br />The display of the cost recovery figures shown in this report is meant to provide a <br />basis for policy development discussions among Council members and City staff, and <br />do not represent a recommendation for where or how the Council should take action. <br />The setting of the “rate” or “price” for services, whether at 100 percent full cost recovery <br />or lower, is a policy decision to be made only by the Council, often with input from City <br />staff and the community. <br />5. CONSIDERATIONS FOR COST RECOVERY POLICY AND UPDATES <br /> The Matrix Consulting Group recommends that the City use the information <br />contained in this report to discuss, adopt, and implement a formal Cost Recovery Policy, <br />and also to implement a mechanism for the annual update of fees for service. <br />(1) Adopt a Formal Cost Recovery Policy <br /> The Matrix Consulting Group strongly recommends that the Council adopt a <br />formal cost recovery policy for each individual department or division included in this <br />Study. Whenever a cost recovery policy is established at less than 100% of the full cost <br />7.A. - Page 15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.