My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-06-26 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-06-26 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:53:14 PM
Creation date
6/22/2017 4:17:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/26/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
646
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA <br />Cost of Services (User Fee) Study <br />Matrix Consulting Group Page 5 <br />As the graph shows, City Clerk and Finance and Parks, Recreation & Community <br />Services divisions are maintaining a cost recovery level higher than typically seen for <br />other jurisdictions, while Library at 14% and Public Works at 99% are within the typical <br />range of cost recovery for their respective services. <br />In recent years, more local jurisdictions have adopted formal cost recovery <br />policies at the department / division level. The Matrix Consulting Group considers a <br />formalized cost recovery policy for various fees for service an industry Best <br />Management Practice. The cost recovery policy defines a different level of cost recovery <br />for each department / division directly related to the service it provides to the public. If it <br />is a department that is primarily related to providing services that benefit residents as a <br />whole such as police, fire, or parks and recreation the cost recovery policy is typically <br />lower than departments / divisions such as Building or planning which primarily benefit <br />private users of service. Therefore, having clear policy goals, enables City staff and <br />council to set fees that are in compliance with that policy as well as serve the overall <br />philosophy of the City. <br /> (2) Adopt an Annual Fee Update / Increase Mechanism <br /> The purpose of a comprehensive update is to completely revisit the analytical <br />structure, service level estimates and assumptions applied to the previous fee schedule, <br />and to account for any major shifts in cost components or organizational structures. The <br />Matrix Consulting Group believes it is a Best Management Practice to perform a <br />complete update of a Fee Assessment every 3 to 5 years. <br /> In between comprehensive updates, the City could utilize published industry <br />economic factors such as CPI or other regional factors to update the cost calculations <br />7.A. - Page 17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.