My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-06-26 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-06-26 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:53:14 PM
Creation date
6/22/2017 4:17:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/26/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
646
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA <br />Cost of Services (User Fee) Study <br />Matrix Consulting Group Page 7 <br /> <br />2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY <br />CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />A “user fee” is a charge for service provided by a governmental agency to a <br />public citizen or group. In California, several constitutional laws such as Propositions 13, <br />4, and 218, State Government Codes 66014 and 66016, and more recently Proposition <br />26 and the Attorney General’s Opinion 92-506 set the parameters under which the user <br />fees typically administered by local government are established and administered. <br />Specifically, California State Law, Government Code 66014(a), stipulates that user fees <br />charged by local agencies “…may not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of <br />providing the service for which the fee is charged”. <br />1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND PHILOSOPHIES REGARDING USER FEES <br /> Local governments are providers of many types of general services to their <br />communities. While all services provided by local government are beneficial to <br />constituents, some services can be classified as globally beneficial to all citizens, while <br />others provide more of a direct benefit to a specific group or individual. The following <br />table provides examples of services provided by local government within a continuum of <br />the degree of community benefit received: <br /> <br />Services that Provide <br />General “Global” <br />Community Benefit <br />Services that Provide Both <br />“Global” Benefit and also a <br />Specific Group or Individual <br />Benefit <br />Services that Provide a Primary <br />Benefit to an Individual or Group, <br />with less “Global” Community <br />Benefit <br /> <br />• Police <br />• Park Maintenance <br /> <br /> <br />• Recreation / Community <br />Services <br />• Fire Suppression / Prevention <br /> <br />• Building Permits <br />• Planning and Zoning Approval <br />• Site Plan Review <br />• Engineering Development Review <br />• Facility Rentals <br /> <br />7.A. - Page 19
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.