Laserfiche WebLink
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />SEPTEMBER 2016 <br />ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> <br /> <br />P:\RWC1401B Rocketship School\PRODUCTS\IS-MND\Public\Rocketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx (09/29/16) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 34 <br />evaluate the effectiveness of the active system. DTSC will not approve the proposed use of the on-site <br />building as a school unless indoor air screening levels are met. With implementation of the Work Plan <br />and soil vapor recovery system, indoor air quality associated with the project would not expose <br />sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Furthermore, the soil vapor is an existing <br />condition that is not caused or exacerbated by the project. <br /> <br />Outdoor Air Quality. Emissions of VOCs to outdoor air from the subsurface contamination <br />were evaluated as part of the site characterization and were “considered minor due to atmospheric <br />mixing.”21 Any emissions from the building vapor collection system would similarly disperse in the <br />air and would be below levels of concern. <br /> <br />e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Less-Than-Significant <br />Impact) <br /> <br />The proposed project would not involve permanent land uses or activities that would generate <br />objectionable odors. Construction-related activities, such as exhaust from construction vehicles and <br />equipment and building materials, may result in objectionable odors; however, these odors would be <br />temporary and short in duration. Once operational, the proposed project would not create objectionable <br />odors affecting a substantial number of people. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: <br /> <br /> <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or <br />through habitat modifications, on any species <br />identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status <br />species in local or regional plans, policies, or <br />regulations, or by the California Department of Fish <br />and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br /> <br /> <br />b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian <br />habitat or other sensitive natural community identified <br />in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by <br />the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />21 The Source Group Inc., 2016, op. cit. <br /> <br />ATTY/RESO.0032/PC RESO APPROVING CEQA - 860 CHARTER ST. EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 06-15-17 PR <br />Page 42 of 124