Laserfiche WebLink
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />SEPTEMBER 2016 <br />ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> <br /> <br />P:\RWC1401B Rocketship School\PRODUCTS\IS-MND\Public\Rocketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx (09/29/16) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 37 <br /> Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: <br /> <br /> <br />a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of a historical resource as defined in <br />§15064.5? <br /> <br /> <br />b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifi- <br />cance of an archaeological resource pursuant to <br />§15064.5? <br /> <br /> <br />c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontologi- <br />cal resource or site or unique geologic feature? <br /> <br /> <br />d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred <br />outside of formal cemeteries? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in <br />Section 15064.5? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) <br /> <br />The project site is currently developed with an existing one-story warehouse structure built in the <br />1950s and an associated surface parking lot. The project site is not within a historic district24 and the <br />existing building is not considered to be a cultural resource for the purposes of CEQA. Therefore, <br />proposed exterior and interior renovations to the existing building, including the addition of a partial <br />second story, to accommodate the proposed new school use would not alter the significance of a <br />historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5. <br /> <br />b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant <br />to Section 15064.5? (Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated) <br /> <br />The proposed project consists of exterior and interior renovations to the existing building and redevel- <br />opment of the existing surface parking lot. The depth of excavation would be minimal, at approxi- <br />mately 1 foot below the ground surface to allow for installation of new pavements and utilities. <br /> <br />Generally, Native American-related archaeological resources within Redwood City have been found <br />in areas near the San Francisco Bay, on inland ridges, midslope benches, and in valleys near intermit- <br />tent and perennial watercourses;25 none of these features are located within or in the immediate <br />vicinity of the site (the nearest water course is located approximately 0.5 miles from the site). The site <br />itself is highly disturbed due to previous development and the potential for surface and subsurface <br />archaeological deposits to be present at the project site is considered to be low. Although it is unlikely <br /> <br />24 Redwood City, City of, 2010. Redwood City General Plan, Figure BE-28: Historic Districts. <br />25 Redwood City, City of, 2010. Redwood City New General Plan, Draft Environmental Impact Report. May. <br /> <br />ATTY/RESO.0032/PC RESO APPROVING CEQA - 860 CHARTER ST. EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 06-15-17 PR <br />Page 45 of 124