My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC17-07 0032 PC Reso Approving CEQA - 860 Charter St
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Reso PC17-07 0032 PC Reso Approving CEQA - 860 Charter St
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2017 4:18:31 PM
Creation date
6/28/2017 4:06:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />SEPTEMBER 2016 <br />ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> <br /> <br />P:\RWC1401B Rocketship School\PRODUCTS\IS-MND\Public\Rocketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx (09/29/16) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 41 <br />depressurization system (SSDS) designed to address the presence of VOCs inside the project site <br />structure; no geologic impacts related to construction or operation of the SSDS were identified. <br /> <br />a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, <br />injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most <br />recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area <br />or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; ii) Strong seismic groundshaking; iii) <br />Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; iv) Landslides? (Potentially Significant <br />Unless Mitigation Incorporated) <br /> <br />Fault Rupture. Fault rupture is generally expected to occur along active fault traces that have <br />exhibited signs of recent geological movement (i.e., within the past 11,000 years). Alquist-Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zones delineate areas around active faults with potential surface fault rupture <br />hazards that would require specific geological investigations prior to approval of certain kinds of <br />development within the delineated area. The project site is not located within or adjacent to an <br />Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.28,29 The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone for the Cañada <br />Fault (a local splay of the San Andreas Fault) is located approximately 4 miles southwest of the <br />project site and the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone for the San Andreas Fault is located <br />approximately 4.5 miles southwest of the project site. Additionally, the project site is not located over <br />any other potentially active faults (faults that have shown evidence of movement in the past 2 million <br />years) that cross Redwood City.30 Therefore, the potential of the proposed project to expose people or <br />structures to risk as a result of fault rupture is less than significant. <br /> <br />Ground Shaking. There are multiple active faults that have the potential to generate strong to <br />violent ground shaking at the project site.31 These faults include the San Andreas Fault, located about <br />5 miles to the southwest; the San Gregorio Fault, located about 14 miles to the southwest; the <br />Hayward Fault, located about 14 miles to the northeast; and the Calaveras Fault, located about 20 <br />miles to the northeast.32,33 The U.S. Geological Survey’s Working Group on California Earthquake <br />Probabilities estimated that there is a 63 percent probability that one or more moment magnitude <br />(Mw) 6.734 or greater earthquakes will occur in the San Francisco Bay Area between 2007 and 2036. <br />The probability of a MW 6.7 magnitude or greater earthquake occurring along individual faults was <br />estimated to be 21 percent along the San Andreas Fault, 31 percent along the Hayward Fault, and 7 <br /> <br />28 California Department of Conservation, 1982. Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones, Palo Alto Quadrangle. <br />Website: www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/WH/regulatorymaps.htm. <br />29 Redwood City, City of, 2010. Redwood City General Plan - Public Safety Element, Figure PS-2. <br />30 Ibid. <br />31 Association of Bay Area Governments, 2014. Geographic Information Systems, Shaking Scenarios. Website: <br />gis.abag.ca.gov (accessed November 14, 2014). <br />32 California Geological Survey, 2010. 2010 Fault Activity Map of California, Geologic Data Map No. 6. Website: <br />www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/FAM/faultactivitymap.html (accessed November 14, 2014). <br />33 Association of Bay Area Governments, 2014, op. cit. <br />34 Moment magnitude (MW) is now commonly used to characterize seismic events as opposed to Richter Magnitude. <br />Moment magnitude is determined from the physical size (area) of the rupture of the fault plane, the amount of horizontal <br />and/or vertical displacement along the fault plane, and the resistance to rupture of the rock type along the fault. <br /> <br />ATTY/RESO.0032/PC RESO APPROVING CEQA - 860 CHARTER ST. EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 06-15-17 PR <br />Page 49 of 124
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.