My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1999-05-17 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CC Min 1999-05-17 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:43:05 PM
Creation date
5/6/2002 12:29:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/17/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
K. Approve warrants dated through May 17, 1999, and usual and necessary payments dated <br /> through May 24, 1999; APPROVED <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously by those present with Council Member Jordan and Mayor <br /> Howard absent. <br /> <br /> 3. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY - None <br /> 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None <br /> 5. BOARDS, COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS - None <br /> 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None <br /> 7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS - None <br /> <br /> 8. STAFF REPORTS <br /> <br /> A. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Procedures. <br /> <br /> Engineering and Construction Manager Patterson opened the report with a synopsis of the <br /> traffic situation to date and the need to have local involvement at the regional level in light <br /> of various projects either being planned or discussed that impact the City. Mr. Patterson <br /> asked City Council to endorse a plan to be utilized at the local neighborhood level that <br /> expedites traffic calming measures. <br /> <br /> Don Smith, traffic consultant, began his report indicating that streamlining is the key in <br />--- handling various issues. Local traffic is controversial and residents' interests and <br /> viewpoints vary greatly. Sought recognition that all situations may not result in a perfect <br /> scenario and would like to see a decision rather than a deferral while understanding that <br /> there may be conflict. Mr. Smith described their process for local street issues and <br /> requested acknowledgement or revision. Enforcement instead of traffic calming is an issue <br /> to many residents. The Capital Improvement Process is not understood, prompting <br /> frustrations as to why traffic devices are not being installed. Mr. Smith proposed an <br /> education program by utilizing a library of movable message signs to cause behavioral <br /> change. Augmentation of the contract school crossing guard program could result in less <br /> traffic requests in the future. <br /> <br /> Comments by Council included support for the matrix; favor for a global approach to <br /> traffic, interest in the novelty sign program, request for explanation of ramifications of the <br /> City not following the warrant; asked about other traffic calming procedures such as photo <br /> radar and photo red light detectors; indicated problem in identifying impacted parties; <br /> asked for explanation of "reasonable notification" using the Portland curve in the <br /> Edgewood Road scenario and urged notification of homeowner associations very early on <br /> in the process. <br /> <br /> Public Comment: <br /> <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES BOOK NO. 57 MAY 17, 1999 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 327 PAGE 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.