Laserfiche WebLink
David Menche, speaking for Rheba McKinley and Jacquelyn Palmer, spoke about issues such as safety, <br /> character and damage. Suggested looking at the problem differently. Felt Council was not looking out <br /> for their interests. Concerned about misinformation, intolerance, and requested Council work with <br /> citizens on case by case basis. <br /> <br /> Carlo Montisano, speaking for Joyce Dionne, Richard Dionne, Sr., Dolores Bamberger and Jeff Frost <br /> and Redwood City Neighbors for Reasonable Action, collected 1,483 signatures. Supports 72 hour <br /> parking regulation and commercial owners. Does not see purpose of ordinance. Asked Consultant <br /> Alexander several questions emanating from August 9 meeting and cited those answers. He questioned <br /> the safety of commercial vans compared to large SUV's and asked Council to consider the facts. <br /> <br /> Steven Powers does not support fees and permit. He asked for protection of children and that the Police <br /> Department be proactive. <br /> <br /> Alan Carson owns a vehicle just larger than the proposed allowed size. He stated he has no problem <br /> with enforcement from Police Department, but he cannot shrink his track size. <br /> <br /> Peter Matuz expressed hardship under the proposal and asked to fix roads in another way. <br /> <br /> Joe Graycar was surprised and urged Council drop consideration of ordinance. <br /> <br /> Robert Kahn of Redwood Shores felt offended. With the purpose being safety, he felt moving <br /> Winnebagos would not cover it. He felt tow trucks provide a valuable service and questioned the <br /> ambiguities in the written ordinance. <br /> <br />.... Judy Hanson, speaking for Rosalie Dolce, referred to Oiannini relocating to Redwood City after 1906 <br /> earthquake. She opposed the proposal and felt the majority should rule. <br /> <br /> Peter Foitzik first to cimumvent the State law and discriminate against blue-collar people, small <br /> business people by proposing the ordinance. He questioned various parts of the proposed regulations. <br /> <br /> Mayor Howard introduced, for the record, a letter from PG & E asking for consideration of one <br /> employee with a need to park an oversized company vehicle. Mayor Howard also asked that the <br /> numerous e-mails, telephone calls and letters submitted in favor of some sort of ordinance, along with <br /> the submitted petition be entered into the record. <br /> <br /> Recess- 10:45- 11:00 p.m. <br /> <br /> M/S Claire/Harmett to extend meeting to 11:30 p.m. The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br /> Council comments included requesting a pulse of the Council rather than comments, question of <br /> reasonableness of the truck regulation, feeling in the community of clarification of sincerity of intent, <br /> need for openness of intemions, recommendation that the subcommittee meet with a formal group and <br /> other interested citizens. Suggested rejecting the draft proposed ordinance and that an overall vehicle- <br /> parking problem does exist, citing the fact some citizens are afraid to speak up and complain <br /> anonymously. <br /> <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINI3 MINUTES BOOK NO. 57 SEPTEMBER 27, 1999 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 425 PAGE 6 <br /> <br /> <br />