My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt04 Warren, Charles B. (2)
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agmt04 Under $60K
>
Agmt04 Warren, Charles B. (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:29:01 PM
Creation date
11/23/2004 8:39:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Charles B. Warren
PROJECT NAME
GID 1-64 appraisal services
RMP File Number
304.5
Date
11/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Valuation & Consultation <br /> 2033 <br />SCHEDULE A: REDWOOD SHORES, Scope of work, 2005 Powell <br />The scope of work proposed is to provide a re-assessment to market value of the property generally known as Street <br />Redwood Shores, and consisting of rough Iy 4,350 parcels of real property. San <br />Thework will intend to complywith the Un iform Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice, and anyadditional Francisco <br />standards of the California State Board of Equalization. <br /> California <br />The date of value will be 1 january, 2005. <br /> 94133 <br />In general this assignment can be broken down into phases. <br /> Phone <br /> Phase I: New construction - This phase, to commence on or about 1 january, 2005, intends to <br />identify and quantify any changes to the properties assessed since lien date 2004. Th is includes identi fyi ng any 415. <br />new structures. It also includes identifying and quantifying any alterations to existing structures which are 433. 0959 <br />material to their market value. <br /> Phase II: Residential valuati on - This is the most time consuming analysis task in the assignment. Fax <br />The scope includes identifying property sold within the last year and applying statistical techniques, such as 415. <br />mu Itiple regression analysis, to extract the importalit factors contributing to their val ue. The resulti ng models <br />will be applied to the various neighborhoods and developments in the district. In the process, a sample of the 982.1441 <br />sold properties must necessarily be inspected to confirm the validity of the models and the trends which they <br />incorporate. <br /> Phase III: Valuation of commercial, multiple family residential, hotel, land, and property of other <br />uses. Portions of this phase, principally data colection run concurrently with phases I and II. The objective of <br />th is phase is to arrive at values forthe properties with in the district wh ich are not individual residenti al parcels. <br />In some cases statistical valuation methods are usefu I, but in general the val uation of these property types is more <br />labor intensive. <br /> Phase IV: Assembly of the assessment roll. Next to the residential revaluation, this is probably <br />the most time consuming portion of the assignment, translating the analytic findings into consistent individual <br />values posted to the roll. The assessment roll is the fj nal product of the assignment and will be delivered in both <br />hard copy, with explanatory text, and in ASCII format fOI" the use of data processing in creating bond payment <br />bills. Delivery of this product is to be on or before 1 june, 2005. <br /> Phase V: Assessment appeals - This task is not included in the fixed portion of this bid. <br />Necessarily, whenever property is reassessed, there will be some taxpayers who are unhappy. Their recourse <br />is to appeal. Defense of appeals requires the preparation of individual appraisals which are more time <br />consuming per property than mass appraisal, and time is needed to negotiate with the property owners. <br />Depending on appeal volume, time and cost wi II vary. Ten days are allocated to this function, but less have been <br />needed in the last several years. <br /> Defense of assessment appeals is an advisable deterrent to frivolous or self-serving appeals. The <br />appellant's calcu Ius must include the probability of victory, and the cost of that victory. The appellant should <br />also see the I ikelihood that any unrealistic valuation that might result in the process will simply be reversed the <br />following year, requiring repitition of an uncertain and costly process. If appellants see that the system wi II deal <br />with real problems, but defend and win cases which are without merit, such cases are less likely to be fi led. <br />Charles B. Warren, ASA <br />URBAN REAL PROPERTY <br /> Exhibit A-I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.