My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt04 Warren, Charles B. (2)
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agmt04 Under $60K
>
Agmt04 Warren, Charles B. (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:29:01 PM
Creation date
11/23/2004 8:39:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Charles B. Warren
PROJECT NAME
GID 1-64 appraisal services
RMP File Number
304.5
Date
11/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> Valuation & Consultation <br /> 2033 <br /> SCHEDULE A: REDWOOD SHORES, Scope of work, 2005 Powell <br /> The scope of work proposed is to provide a re-assessment to market value ofthe property generally known as Street <br /> Redwood Shores, and consisting of rough Iy 4,350 parcels of real property. San <br /> Theworkwill intendto complywith the Un ¡form Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice, and any additional Francisco <br /> standards of the California State Board of Equalization. <br /> California <br /> The date of value wi II be 1 January, 2005. <br /> 94133 <br /> In general this assignment can be broken down into phases. <br /> Phone <br /> Phase I: New construction - This phase, to commence on or about 1 January, 2005, intends to <br /> identify and quantify any changes to the properties assessed since lien date2004. This includes identifying any 415. <br /> new structures. It also includes identifying and quantifying any alterations to existing structures which are 433. 0959 <br /> material to their market value. <br /> Phase II: Residential val uati on - This isthe most time consuming analysis task in the assignment. Fax <br /> The scope includes identifying property sold within the last year and applying statistical techniques, such as 415. <br /> mu Itiple regression analysis, to extract the important factors contributing to their val ue. The resulti ng models <br /> will be applied to the various neighborhoods and developments in the district. In the process, a sample of the 982.1441 <br /> sold properties must necessarily be inspected to confirm the validity of the models and the trends which they <br /> incorporate. <br /> Phase III: Valuation ofcoml11ercial, multiple family residential, hotel, land, and property of other <br /> uses. Portions of this phase, principally data colection run concurrently with Phases I and II. The objective of <br /> this phase is to arrive at values for the properties with i n the district wh ich are not individual residenti al parcels. <br /> In some cases statistical valuation methods are useful, but in general the val uation of these property types is more <br /> labor intensive. <br /> Phase IV: Assembly of the assessment roll. Next to the residential reval uation, th is is probably <br /> the most time consum ing portion of the assignment, translating the analyticfindings into consistent individual <br /> values posted to the roll. The assessment roll is the final product of the assignment and will be delivered in both <br /> hard copy, with explanatory text, and in ASCII format for the use of data processing in creating bond payment <br /> bills. Delivery of this product is to be on or before 1 June, 2005. <br /> Phase V: Assessment appeals - This task is not included in the fixed portion of this bid. <br /> Necessarily, whenever property is reassessed, there will be some taxpayers who are unhappy. Their recourse <br /> is to appeal. Defense of appeals requires the preparation of individual appraisals which are more time <br /> consuming per property than mass appraisal, and time is needed to negotiate with the property owners. <br /> Depending on appeal volume, time and costwìll vary. Ten days are al located to this function, but less have been <br /> needed in the last several years. <br /> Defense of assessment appeals is an advisable deterrent to frivolous or self-serving appeals. The <br /> appellant's calculus must include the probability of victory, and the cost of that victory. The appellant should <br /> also see the I ikelihood that any unrealistic valuation that might resu It in the process will simply be reversed the <br /> following year, requiring repitition of an uncertain and costly process. If appellants see that the system wi II deal <br /> with real problems, but defend and win cases which are without merit, such cases are less likely to be fi led. <br /> Charles B. Warren, ASA <br /> URBAN REAL PROPERTY <br /> Exhibit A-I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.