Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.D. - Page 11 <br /> Here is a sampling of the responses: <br /> • Surveillance is: questionable <br /> • Surveillance is: important <br /> • Surveillance can be used against a peaceful public <br /> • Surveillance is: Technology run amok. Just because we can do it, should we do it? <br /> • Surveillance is: Everywhere. Privacy is a myth in the digital era <br /> • Surveillance is: State violence <br /> • Surveillance is: Not a solution to the systemic problems that create crime and violence. <br /> Surveillance No! Education, Equity and Respect,Yes! <br /> • Surveillance is: Great!!! Bring it on. It's for my safety, your safety. Nothing to hide14 <br /> Privacy advocates have pointed out the impact that surveillance technology may have on <br /> residents: "Our concerns stem from the fact that license plate readers can scan and collect the <br /> information of innocent people, innocent drivers," said Chris Conley, a policy attorney with the <br /> ACLU of Northern California. "Location information can reveal very sensitive information about <br /> people. If they're visiting a church, or a clinic or even open-mic night at a bar, all of these things <br /> reveal information about a person that shouldn't be sitting in a database somewhere."15 <br /> Case in point: One San Leandro resident's eye-opening experience <br /> After learning that the city of San Leandro had purchased an ALPR for its Police Department in <br /> 2008, computer security consultant Michael Katz-Lacabe asked city officials to send him a <br /> record of every instance the scanners photographed his car. <br /> An article on sfgate.com describes what Mr. Katz-Lacabe learned: <br /> The results shocked him. <br /> The paperback-size device, installed on the outside of police cars, can log thousands of <br /> license plates in an eight-hour patrol shift. Katz-Lacabe said it had photographed his two <br /> cars on 112 occasions, including one image from 2009 that shows him and his daughters <br /> stepping out of his Toyota Prius in their driveway. <br /> That photograph, Katz-Lacabe said, made him "frightened and concerned about the <br /> magnitude of police surveillance and data collection." The single patrol car in San <br /> Leandro equipped with a plate reader had logged his car once a week on average, <br /> photographing his license plate and documenting the time and location.16 <br /> 14 Cole Goins,"What Oakland,California,residents think about police surveillance,"Reveal from the Center for Investigative <br /> Reporting,August 18,2015.https://www.revealnews.org/article/what-oakland-califoniia-residents-think-about-police- <br /> surveillance/. <br /> 15 Samantha Weigel,"Who's watching who?:License plate readers used throughout San Mateo County,"The Daily Journal, <br /> April 8,2015.http://www.smdailyjoumal.com/articles/lnews/2015-04-08/whos-watching-who-license-plate-readers-used- <br /> throughout-san-mateo-county/1776425141346.htm1 <br /> 16 Ali Winston,"License plate readers tracking cars,"SFGate,June 25,2013.http://www.sfgate.comibayarea/article/License- <br /> plate-readers-tracking-cars-4622476.php. <br /> 2016-2017 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 4 <br />