Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 118 <br /> LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br /> SEPTEMBER 2016 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> Background Plus Project traffic volumes are shown in Figure 13. As shown in Table 9,under <br /> Background Plus Project conditions, six of the nine study intersections would continue to operate at <br /> acceptable levels of service and the intersections of Broadway and Woodside Road,Middlefield Road <br /> and Woodside Road,and Bay Road and Charter Street would continue to operate at LOS E during the <br /> AM and PM peak hours with the addition of project traffic. However,the added project trips would <br /> not have a significant impact at these intersections based on the City's level of service standards. <br /> Therefore,the proposed project would not result in a significant impact to the operations of any of the <br /> study area intersections during the Background Plus Project conditions. <br /> Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Conditions. The results of the intersection level of <br /> service analysis under Cumulative Conditions are shown in Table 10. The results indicate that five of <br /> the nine study intersections would operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak <br /> hours. However,the intersections at Broadway and Woodside Road(Intersection 92);Middlefield <br /> Road and Woodside Road(Intersection 94);which is a CMP intersection;Bay Road and Charter <br /> Street(Intersection 95); and Bay Road and Douglas Avenue(Intersection 99)would operate at an <br /> unacceptable LOS E or F during the AM and/or PM peak hours. <br /> Cumulative Plus Project traffic volumes are shown in Figure 14. As shown in Table 10,under <br /> Cumulative Plus Project conditions five of the study intersections would continue to operate at <br /> acceptable levels of service. The intersections of Broadway and Woodside Road,Middlefield Road and <br /> Woodside Road,Bay Road and Charter Street,and Bay Road and Douglas Avenue would continue to <br /> operate at an unacceptable LOS E or F during the AM and/or PM peak hours. However,the added <br /> project trips would not have a significant impact at these intersections based on the City's level of <br /> service standards. Therefore,the proposed project would not result in a significant impact to the <br /> operations of any of the study area intersections during the Cumulative Plus Project conditions. <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level <br /> of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county <br /> congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (Less-Than-Significant <br /> Impact) <br /> The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County(C/CAG)administers the San <br /> Mateo County Congestion Management Program(CMP). The CMP requires new development <br /> projected to add 100 or more peak hour trips to the CMP roadway network to implement Travel <br /> Demand Management(TDM)measures that would reduce project impacts. In the vicinity of the <br /> project site, facilities that are part of the CMP network include US 101,Woodside Road(SR 84)and <br /> El Camino Real(SR 82). The Middlefield Road and Woodside Road(SR-84)intersection(Intersection <br /> 94)is the only CMP intersection within the project study area. The CMP level of service standard for <br /> this intersection is LOS E or better. <br /> As discussed above in Section XVLa and as shown in Tables 8, 9,and 10,this intersection would <br /> continue to operate at LOS D during Existing Plus Project conditions; LOS D during the AM peak <br /> hour and LOS E during the PM peak hour under Background Plus Project conditions; and LOS E <br /> during Cumulative Plus Project conditions. Operations at this intersection would not degrade below <br /> LOS E with implementation of the proposed project. Therefore,the proposed project would not <br /> conflict with an applicable congestion management program or other standards set forth by the <br /> C/CAG. <br /> P:1RWC1401B Rocketship Sch-I\PRODUCrSUS-MND1Public\Ra ketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx(09/29/16)PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 94 <br /> ATTY/RESO.0084/CC RESO ADOPTING CEQA-ROCKETSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL APPEAL <br /> REV:09-05-17 VR Page 102 of 124 <br />