Laserfiche WebLink
TA. - Page 192 <br /> Traffic Analysis Review of Proposed Rocketship Charter School,Redwood City, CA <br /> Introduction <br /> This letter report summarizes the findings of PRISM Engineering regarding the traffic impact <br /> study prepared by Hexagon, as well as our observations in the field of real world traffic and <br /> parking, etc., and concerns as it relates to school uses in this industrially zoned area. <br /> Existing Conditions and Surroundings <br /> The intersection of Woodside Road (SR 84) at Bay Road calculates to LOS C conditions using the <br /> Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010 methodology. PRISM Engineering counted the traffic <br /> turning movements at this location, and ran the industry standard HCM analysis using Synchro <br /> software. This similar calculation result was shown in Table 3 of the Hexagon traffic impact study <br /> for the project. This calculation would be correct if it were not for the fact that this intersection <br /> is only 600 feet away from another intersection, Woodside at Broadway which is also at LOS F <br /> conditions (calculated as LOS E in a vacuum). LOS F conditions also exist at the US 101 freeway <br /> ramp intersections. This LOS F condition at the freeway ramps translates back all the way to the <br /> Bay Road intersection, and beyond, as observed in the field. There is actually an observable LOS <br /> F condition at the Woodside and Bay Road intersection during the am peak hour because of <br /> blockage of traffic backing up from the US 101 interchange. This results in the northbound traffic <br /> on Woodside having a stop and go condition. Traffic does not freely flow through this <br /> intersection. I observed in the field while counting the traffic at Woodside and Bay that the <br /> northbound approach was at LOS F conditions because of this, and that the northbound approach <br /> was 42%of the total traffic at this intersection. Because the intersection is so close to Broadway <br /> and also to the US 101 freeway ramp intersections, these can only be accurately calculated using <br /> a traffic operations microsimulation methodology,which was beyond the scope of our study(this <br /> would require much more data collection for all intersections, and the building of a <br /> microsimulation model). <br /> In the CALTRANS GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF <br /> TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES, it specifically stipulates that the <br /> only kind of traffic analysis that is correct for closely spaced <br /> intersections on its surface street facilities is detailed <br /> microsimulation analysis, which was NOT done in the <br /> GUIDE FORT"IIF:PREPARATION Hexagon traffic analysis. Caltrans states: <br /> OF <br /> TRAFFIC TNIPACT STI-DIS "When a State highway has saturated flows, the use of a <br /> micro-simulation model is encouraged for the analysis" <br /> I can definitively state that, based on my actual observations of traffic operations of this <br /> intersection in the field during the am peak hour, that LOS F conditions are significantly present. <br /> 42% of the traffic (the northbound approach) are delayed significantly, and waiting more than <br /> one signal cycle to get through. This is an LOS F condition, and especially <br /> -OW , "PRISM'-' Page 2 <br /> � <br /> � •,,i ENGINEERING s <br />