Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />The Effects of a $15 Minimum Wage by 2019 in Santa Clara County and San Jose 16 <br /> <br />1. PREVIOUS MINIMUM WAGE RESEARCH <br />In the past two decades, economists have conducted numerous econometric studies of the <br />effects of minimum wages. The overwhelming majority have focused on the employment effects <br />(Belman and Wolfson 2014; Belman and Wolfson 2015; Schmitt 2015). Typically these studies <br />make use of panel data on workers or firms from standard government sources such as the <br />Current Population Survey or the Quarterly Census on Employment and Wages. <br />Most extant research on minimum wages does not detect significant effects on workers age 20 <br />and over. Some observers attribute the lack of visible effects to the relatively small proportion of <br />adults who were affected by past minimum wage increases in the U.S.4 These observers argue <br />that minimum wage effects should be detectible by examining groups that are more affected, <br />notably teens and restaurant workers (Brown 1999). <br />Economists have therefore focused on these two groups. After two decades of methodological <br />controversy among researchers, the literature has produced some areas of agreement. In <br />particular, recent studies of the effects on restaurant workers by researchers with opposing <br />methodological views have arrived at a consensus: the employment effects are either extremely <br />small or non-existent.5 The effects of minimum wages on teen employment remain somewhat <br />controversial. Some researchers find significant but not large negative effects (Neumark, Salas, <br />and Wascher 2014) while others find effects that are much smaller, close to zero (Allegretto et al. <br />2015). <br />The remaining controversy over effects on teens has become less relevant than it once was. <br />While teens once represented one-fourth of all workers affected by minimum wages nationwide, <br />their importance has fallen to less than half that level today. We find that teens represent only <br />4.5 percent of the workers who would be affected by the proposed $15 Santa Clara County <br />minimum wage. Moreover, compared to teens, the rest of the low-wage workforce is older and <br />has more work experience and schooling than was the case in previous decades. Results that are <br />specific to teens are therefore not as informative for the effects on the workforce as a whole. <br />This minimum wage research uses quasi-experimental methods, exploiting time and state <br />variation between 1979 and 2012 in federal and state minimum wages to identify causal effects. <br />The most credible of the studies use state of the art statistical methods to ensure that the causal <br />comparisons are apples to apples. However, the minimum wage changes in these past <br />experiences, which peak at about $10, generated increases for at most 8-10 percent of the <br />workforce. In contrast, approximately 31 percent of all workers would receive a wage increase in <br />the $15 San Jose scenario and 25 percent in the $15 Santa Clara County scenario, far higher <br />than is the case in the minimum wage research literature to date. As a result, this previous <br />research is at best only suggestive of the effects we consider here. <br />8.A. - Page 30