My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2017 8:58:20 AM
Creation date
9/21/2017 12:45:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/25/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
398
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />The Effects of a $15 Minimum Wage by 2019 in Santa Clara County and San Jose 28 <br /> <br />3.5 Downstream effects <br />The increases in earnings shown in Tables 4 and 5 would be substantial and would have an <br />immediate impact on the lives of low-wage workers and their families in San Jose and Santa <br />Clara County. But it is important to recognize that there are longer-term effects of minimum wage <br />increases as well. <br />Low wages have been shown to affect workers negatively in a variety of ways, but the health <br />impacts are most pronounced. All else being equal, low wages (and in turn poverty) result in <br />increased rates of high blood pressure and high levels of stress, as well as shorter life expectancy <br />(Leigh and Du 2012). A recent study from the United Kingdom found that by reducing the <br />financial strain on low-wage workers, an increase in the minimum wage improves mental health <br />at a level comparable to the effect of antidepressants on depression (Reeves et al. 2016). In <br />another study, additional income led to fewer arrests for parents and increases in parental <br />supervision of their children (Akee et al. 2010). Similarly, increases in Earned Income Tax Credit <br />(EITC) program payments led to improvements in the mental health of mothers (Evans and <br />Garthwaite 2010; Congressional Budget Office 2012). <br />Multiple rigorous studies also establish a causal negative effect of low incomes on outcomes for <br />children. A recent review of peer-reviewed articles found that 29 of 34 studies established a <br />negative effect of poverty on children’s outcomes (K. Cooper and Stewart 2013). Using data from <br />a randomized control trial of the Minnesota Family Investment Program, researchers found <br />positive, significant effects on children’s social behavior and school engagement due to increases <br />in income (Morris and Gennetian 2003). Other researchers analyzed data from ten such studies <br />and found significant effects of increased income on school achievement (Rodgers 2004). <br />Generally, these studies show that additional income has a positive effect on the outcomes of <br />children in households of all income levels. However, multiple studies also suggest that <br />additional income has a larger effect in very-low-income households compared to middle-income <br />households (Dahl and Lochner 2012); (Akee et al. 2010); (Costello et al. 2003). Some evidence <br />indicates that additional income early in life is important to cognitive outcomes, whereas <br />additional income in later childhood may be more important in terms of behavioral outcomes (K. <br />Cooper and Stewart 2013). <br />8.A. - Page 42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.