My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2017 8:58:20 AM
Creation date
9/21/2017 12:45:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/25/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
398
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />The Effects of a $15 Minimum Wage by 2019 in Santa Clara County and San Jose 44 <br /> <br />Panel A.23 The result is an estimated net income increase of $204 million by 2019 in San Jose, <br />and $305 million in Santa Clara County and nine nearby counties. We then use IMPLAN to <br />estimate the increase in employment for San Jose resulting from the increased household <br />spending triggered by the income increase, accounting for multiplier effects and spending <br />leakage outside the city (respectively outside Santa Clara County and nine nearby counties).24 <br />Row 9 shows the employment change associated with this increase in income in San Jose <br />(column 1), and in Santa Clara County and nine nearby counties (column 3). <br />Panel D: Net effect <br />As we have previously mentioned, the substitution productivity, scale, and income effects in Parts <br />A to C occur simultaneously, not sequentially. It is thus not correct to infer that the employment <br />changes in Parts A to C actually occur. Net employment changes occur only to the extent that is <br />registered after we add Parts A to C together to obtain the net effects. <br />Panels A to C do tell us that the net effects will likely differ by job wage rates. In particular, the <br />automation and productivity effects in Part A will occur entirely among low-wage jobs. The scale <br />and income effects of Parts B and C, however, will affect jobs throughout the state’s consumer <br />demand industries and among a much broader wage distribution. We have not been able to <br />quantify these differences, as they depend on the relative concentration of scale and income <br />effects in low-wage industries. <br />In Panel D of Table 10, we present our estimate of the net change in employment from scenario <br />A. <br />• For San Jose only (column 1), we estimate a cumulative net loss in employment, due to <br />the policy, of 960 jobs by 2019, or -0.3 percent of total employment. To put this estimate <br />in context, we project, based on past QCEW data on employment that San Jose will grow <br />annually by 1.32 percent from 2014 to 2019. (For more details see Appendix A2.) <br />• For Santa Clara County as a whole and nine nearby counties (column 3), we estimate a <br />cumulative net loss in employment, due to the policy, of 80 jobs by 2019, or -0.0 percent <br />of total employment. We’ve also assumed that this broader region will grow annually by <br />1.32 percent from 2014 to 2019, at the same pace as San Jose. (For more details see <br />Appendix A2.) <br />We emphasize again that our cumulative estimate will be spread over the preceding years of the <br />minimum wage increase—the 2019 estimate includes effects in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. <br />The key point in Table 10 is that a $15 minimum wage has negligible effect on net on <br />employment when examining the region as a whole. <br /> <br />8.A. - Page 58
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.