CC Min 1988-03-21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Item NO. 12 (continued) 7. A mitigated negative declaration was prepared for the Project pursuant to the California environmental Quality Act (•CROA•t Pub. Res. C. $21000 at seq.) and local regulations, dated June 24, 1987. The negative declaration has been reviewed and considered by the City Council, and each member thereof, prior to making a decision on the appeal. 8. The mitigation measures included in the negative declaration address the anticipated traffic volume from the operation of the Project by requiring the Permittee to provide for construction of: Whipple Avenue /north -bound Route 101 on -ramgp intersection improvements, Veterans Boulevard and Whipple Avenue intersection improvements, and traffic storage improvements on East Bayshore Road in the vicinity of the Project site. Those mitigation measures, among others, have been attached as conditions to the use permit. 9. The toning Administrator, on the appeal, has recommended the deletion of Condition No. a as specified in the original use permit, the amendment of Condition No. 7 likewise to specified, and the addition of a now condition, all as set forth in the Report to the Honorable Mayor and City Council dated March 3, 1988 regarding the appeal. 30. The conditions attached to the use permit (including those mitigation measures specified in the negative declaration), as proposed for amendment and modification by the toning Administrator in the aforesaid report, adequately address the traffic congestion and flow anticipated to be generated or caused by the Project, and this Council so finds. il. The Project site is located in the *CG' (General Commercial) zoning district (Ord.No. 1130, the stoning Ordinance•, $1S.2 at sag.). The Project is a conditional use permitted in that district (Zoning Ordinance 515.4di see, also, iubdiv. a) . 12. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the Project will not, under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the Project, nor will it be detrimental or --- -Jnjurious =_pz oparty-_gr_impr0vements in the neighborhood, or to the general welfare of the City in light of the mitigation measures and conditions attached to the use permit because the Project as permitted, and subject to said conditions is consistent with the General Plan, the toning Ordinance, and adequately addresses anticipated effects upon the environment. 13. The use permit, subject to the conditions as amended and modified on appeal, should be granted, and the appeal denied. The foregoing findings, determinations and conclusions were approved by the Council of the City of Redwood City at a regular meeting held on !larch 21, 1988 by the following vote: AM, mad in favors Councilmen Britschgi, Chandler. Greenaich, LaBarge and Mawr Claire NOES, and against: Councilmen Bury and Stangel ABSENT: None (See Minute Order 88 -39 3/14/88) MINUTE ORDER NO. 88- 51 Reg.Ntg. 3/21 /88 Page 8 MINUTE BOOK NO. 48 Page No. 7 -b.