Laserfiche WebLink
system for taxicab fares be accepted until July let unless the Council is dis- <br />satisfied before that time with the way in which the system is working. Notion <br />passed unanimously. Councilman Britschgi did not believe the companies should <br />cancel their meter orders. Attorney Currie advised he would tell the taxicab <br />companies not to cancel their orders. <br />' City Manager Blom asked to have the matter of his report on signs on Bayshore High- <br />way carried on the agenda as he has not received a report from Foster and <br />$leiser. The matter was ordered placed on the agenda. <br />The matter of the abatement of the A. J. Williamson Fertilizer Plant was next dis- <br />cussed, City Manager Blom suggested the file of correspondence in regard to <br />this matter be read. City Clerk Dodge read copy of letter from A. .J. William- <br />son making application for the plant dated January 4, 1946, in which he speci- <br />fied the manner in which he would operate the plant and providing for the <br />fertilizer to be delivered to the plant in a dry condition. The raw product <br />was then to be dumped in the plant on conveyor belts into the processing maoh- <br />inery and sacked. At no time was there to be any stockpiling in the open. <br />City Manager Blom pointed out that the Council had granted the permit in aocor- <br />E <br />dance with the terms as set forth in the application. The first complaint <br />against the plant arose in July, 1946, when neighbors complained of the odors <br />and fly nuisance. He had made an inspection of the property and found the <br />complaint to be in,order and had written to Mr. Williamson on August 2, 1946. <br />The Clerk read this letter which stipulated that no deliveries oY fresh <br />manure were to be made to the plant until a dryer of sufficient capacity to <br />handle each daq�s shipment was in operation,, and'that a spot remote from the <br />plant or any residential or business property be established to dry the fresh <br />manure and that all moist manure on hand at that. time be removed to the pro- <br />posed drying yard and thoroughly dried before returning it to the plant for <br />processing. A further letter dated August 15, 1946, was read in which it was <br />stated that while Mr Williamson had agreed to comply with the conditions <br />stated in the letter of August 2, to date he had not done so, and advising <br />that unless the situation was immediately corrected the matter would be,called <br />to the attention of the Council on August 19th -with the recommendation that <br />the license be revoked. On September 24th, the City Manager wrote to Mr. <br />Williamson advising that the Council had directed that he stop all deliveries <br />of raw manure to the plant until the present stock -pile was completely re- <br />moved and the drying facilities were capable of handling each day's deliveries <br />as they arrived. Complaints continued to be made and the Health Department <br />made an inspection of October 31, 1946, and advised that.the plant had not <br />complied with the recommendations of the Council. The matter was then turned <br />over to the City Attorney who advised Mr. Williamson that recommendation was <br />to be made to the Council to revoke the permit. It was the City Manager's <br />recommendation at this time to revoke the permit for the operation of a fertil- <br />izer plant at this location immediately. Councilman Granger moved, seconded <br />by Councilman McNulty, that the City Manager's recommendation be accepted. <br />Under the question, Mr. A. J. Williamson appeared and asked that he be allowed <br />tl to continue operation of the plant. He stated that he had been removing <br />�I <br />35 <br />0 <br />