Laserfiche WebLink
183 , <br />01TI ATTORNEY CURRIE STATED THAT THE CONDITIONS OF FILING ZrAP OF CORDILLERAS ADDITION CALLED FOR THE SUBDIVIDER <br />TO UY SEVIER N,IAIN, 10" line from Whipple Avenue to "E" Street, 61,L from ItEtt to nGn Street and a 611 water <br />main from Lenolt to Cordilleras Creek. Should any other subdivider connect to the lines referred to, <br />they would be expected to repay the Cordilleras Subdivider one half of the cost. Councilman Morgan moved <br />approval, seconded by Councilman Jones, and carried. <br />CIT'ATTORNEy CURRIE ASSURED COUNCILMAN MORGAN THAT LOYALTY OATHS PERE BEING SIGNED BY ALL Ngy EMPLOYEES, AND <br />THAT ALL PRESENT EMPLOYEES HAD ALREADY SIGNED THE OATH, in line with the recent enacted legislation <br />passed at Sacramento. <br />CORIGII0 ROYER ASKED IF THE CITY HAD ANY JURISDICTION OVER THE CONTROL OF RAILROAD CROSSINGS IN REGARD TO GATES <br />Y SETHER MANUALLY OR AUTOMATICALLY OPERATED. It was the understanding that the Public Utilities Commission <br />had full jurisdiction, and that the City was informed of any proposed changes as a matter of courtesy. <br />ER JAIN REGARDING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OF DOUGLAS AVENUE WINCH IS ALSO A <br />CCO!lGIL1l1N GRANGER ASKED CITY ENGINE <br />I JOINT CITY AND COUNTY PROJECT. Mr. Jain advised petition which his office had prepared was still out <br />z <br />being circulated. This project would require a 60° signup to waive debt limitation. <br />CGO!IOILIgN GRANGER COIdtIENTED ON ITAZEL STREET BEING USED BY HEAVY TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT VIIiICH WAS BREAKING UP <br />THE STREET. Mr. Jain stated that inasmuch as truck routes had not been established there was no way to <br />control this traffic at present. It was recalled that a committee was formed some time ago to study the <br />establishment of a truck route and the local contractors and truck operators were asked to sit in on the <br />deliberations. Councilman Morgan stated his belief that the Traffic Fact Finding Committee should work <br />on the matter. Councilman Granger moved that the proper' authorities should check into this matter, <br />seconded by Councilman Morgan and carried. <br />CONCILRAN GRANGER SUGGESTED THAT THE YAC THARBOR COMMITTEE STUDY THE MATTER OF POSSIBLE MOVING OF THE YACHT <br />lHARBOR. So moved Councilman Granger, seconded by Councilman Jones, and carried. <br />CGb'ICIVAN GRANGER ANNOUNCED TIIAT HE IIAD CONTACTED THE ENGINEERING DEPAP.TMENT REGARDING POSSIBI>E CHANGES IN <br />THEIENOLT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND that the Engineers were studying the matter. <br />ISVI1G ADJOURNED ON MOTION OF COUNCIL MORGAN, seconded by Councilman Royer and carried. <br />jH- <br />Clerk <br />City of Redwood City <br />Minutes of Regular 2,1eeting <br />Redwood City Council <br />October 16, 1950, 8 PM <br />NROLL CAU the following were present: Councilman Floyd D. Granger, S. D. Herkner, Paul Jones, A. H. Morgan, Jr. <br />Ils•H.Royer, R. V. Spillers, (Mayor C. A. Britschgi and City Clerk R. S+ Dodgg. Also present were City <br />tanager E. A- Rolison, City Engineer Glenn M. Jain, City Attorney C. B. Currie, Police Chief Stanley D. <br />Pood, Fire (Chief J. L. Lodi, City Collector P. E. Perrin; Vrater Superintendent, H. L. Winteg, Building <br />rl Inspector L. M. Duncan, Assistant Building Inspector Stephen Kreiss, Administrative Assistant Richard D. <br />s <br />?, Miler and Assessor -Auditor i. J. Brophy. <br />s RIN'1YRS OF REGULAR, MEETING OCTOBER 2ND were approved as mailed on motion of Councilman Morgan with one correction. <br />The minutes should carry a statement that Councilman Morgan took exception to the penalty clause contained <br />I n contracts for improvements and did not -wish to be a party to it in the future. Motion was seconded by <br />councilman Spillers and carried. <br />?LtRiING 00124ISSION REAFFIRI ED RECOMMENDATION APPROVING RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 22 N H S A (314 Nevada) <br />INTO 2LOTS for, the follovring reasons: (1) There are considerable number of lots in the area with less <br />than 501 frontage, (2) persons signed a document favoring such a resubdivision, (3) The lot was originally <br />I <br />