My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1950 to 1952 Book 23
>
BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 4:19:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 3:43:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/15/1950
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1997. + <br />I I SSION OF DATE' FOR HEARING OF RENT DECONTROL (REQUEST OF ANNIE OFFERM�INN). COMMITTE: <br />DISCUSSION <br />I•, !�`I I �I <br />3Y SPILLERS, HERKNER, 14ORGAN AND ROYER. Mayor Birtschgi inquired about a survey <br />COUNCIL IAN <br />Y <br />f City Manager olison stated survey had would b <br />. <br />d not materialized but, e forthcoming <br />on this. <br />very <br />soon. He was informed by the gentlemen conducting the survey it would be a couple ! i <br />t of weeks. Councilman Herkner asked if the petitions submitted (256) names) were in the`�)f' it <br />i'. <br />ea <br />I <br />proper form. Mayor Britschgi suggested that the City Attorney take the list, check it <br />Be <br />le of his findings. Councilman Spillers moved this be carried on the <br />and inform the people <br />id ded b Councilman Morgan and carried. 11 <br />agendas secon Y <br />pppTRgR REPORT BIDS ON ROOF FOR VETERANS BUILDING, BUILDING INSPECTOR DUNCAN. ' The follow- <br />ed = 4 <br />g bids were received from Union Roofing Co., 437 Grand or 1 0 ECR R <br />in 4 9 , Redwood City. <br />#1 Rigidpeer Asbestos Shingles over steep roof with new co valleys (if they can get ,, <br />I I.;k <br />I�' , <br />r iii' ��zqili�.', <br />ee j gr <br />copper) with new tar and gravel roof on flat deck - X2,215. I <br />c'1!: <br />#2 Alternate #1 -Apply over present steep roof Thick Butt Composition Shingles with <br />a°o new copper valleys (if they can get copper) with new tar & gravel roof on flat deck <br />$920. <br />wicth <br />Alternate #2 -Remove and dispose of, present roof, furnish &apply #1 Cedar Shingles <br />#3 <br />I 91' jj <br />laid 42" to weather with #26 gauge galvanized iron valleys and new tar and gravel roof ! '' <br />alldeck -2,1O9.6o. <br />on flat 41 1. <br />Another bid had been received preivously, from Peninsula Roof & Tile Co. which was <br />led ". $1490 for Item #1; 0750 for Item #2 (Alternate #1) and $1,650 for Item #3 (Alternate <br />#2). BuildingInspector was 'asked for his recommendation. If the wanted the roof to 1.I bC <br />Y I ;I! <br />'I„ <br />last for years the first item f or 01,490 ( Peninsula) was recommended, or if they did not <br />wish to go to that expense, he 'recommended the composition for $750 by the same bidder. II,, :„„{ <br />7Granger <br />Councilman Gran er moved a Y ;;.%', <br />g approval of the $ec.ond recommendation, seconded b Councilman <br />Royer and carried. ! <br />i RESOLUTION 998 AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF 6750 FROM UNBUDGETED RESERVE to account f or roof on <br />on Veterans Building.. Warren & Standish was offered by Councilman Granger, and moved N+ ' <br />i for adoption, seconded by Councilman Royer and carried on roll call. F'"!j•I (' <br />not et <br />DISCUSSION OF M. J. KING MAP WOODSIDE TERRACE NO- 4. The Planning Commission could g <br />ht a Quorum for a Special Meeting, therefore this had not been approved by them. Some <br />g <br />items <br />e e to be considered and one was the extension of Virginia Avenue to Woodside <br />Road, however, Mr. Lusk appeared and stated they would like to get the map recorded !', �i', ', it <br />r as soon as g I' <br />possible. Councilman Mor an moved approval of the map subject to approval <br />of the Planning Commission and of the City Engineer, seconded by Councilman Spillers and <br />carried. City Attorney advised that the Council could reaffirm their approval after the 1 <br />PlanningCommission and Engineer' s approval if the wished. Mr. Jain did not wish to <br />Y <br />have as soon as people moved into the <br />i paving construction start during the rains and <br />: <br />new homes they quested street improvements. Mr. re Lusk indicated they would cooperate <br />t 14.,i K <br />with he City on this. ' <br />PROPOS <br />Ifl M IMPROVEIuIENTS a: REDWOOD AVENUE, JUNIPERO TO FAIRVIEW. Some discussion tools place re <br />in that a <br />g g the assessment district in order to construct a bridge in rea. Council <br />enlar <br />man S an and df'I <br />Councilman Morg r <br />Spillers moved that it be dropped from the agenda, seconded by �I <br />hP <br />Carried. This was a local street and did not tie in or connect any arterial streets. <br />f i I <br />Iq � <br />City Manager Rolison suggested putting item of bridges in various parts of the city <br />gg p I' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.