My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 25_1955-08-01 to 1955-11-28 (missing 1954-02-15 to 1955-08-01)
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 PARTIAL BOOK 25
>
BOOK 25_1955-08-01 to 1955-11-28 (missing 1954-02-15 to 1955-08-01)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 4:56:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 4:52:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/1/1955
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
40 0 _ <br />arriving at their estimates. City Manager would like more time to make further <br />studies, stating further that there are no plans available and no comparative <br />figures or estimates between the two sites. He is of the opinion that comparative <br />estimates of both construction and acquisition on the two sites should be made. <br />? <br />Col. Feiss asked if the approval of Mr. Adamson and the City Engineer had been <br />obtained. Councilman Granger stated that all were present and had agreed that a <br />reservoir can be built in the Jefferson Avenue area and made safe from polution. <br />t7 <br />e <br />Mayor Herkner stated that the May 17th meeting was most important, at which time <br />objections to the lower site.. In his opinion, it appeared that the City could <br />it was agreed that the canyon site could be made safe. He stated that Mr. Adamson <br />acquire the Jefferson Avenue site at no cost, and that they must acquire the site <br />and Mr. Jain both agreed to this. Our engineers think that the upper site is pref- <br />at the rear of the hospital. He then asked if it was possible to build ori the lower <br />erable, but if the canyon site is chosen by the committee, they will not object. <br />site and put the money now available into the site in back of the hospital. City <br />I� <br />There was a study meeting held on August 3rd at which time the matter was discussed <br />Engineer Jain replied that he would not object to the Canyon site, but he could not <br />again and the same decision was reached. After that, Mr. Jain did not care to <br />let the inference be made in the committee report that he had agreed that the res- <br />sign the letter approving the lower Jefferson Avenue location. <br />ervoir in the canyon can be built as cheaply as on the Farm Hills site. <br />City Engineer stated he wanted to be on record that neither he nor Mr. Adamson <br />Councilman Granger stated that his letter was based on the August 3rd meeting and <br />agreed that a saving can be made if the reservoir is built in the canyon. He fur- <br />at that time there were no objections from those attending. This matter is now <br />ther stated there were no comparative figures available to indicate the cost of <br />an administrative problem, and it is the thought of the committee that they should <br />building the reservoir. They did not believe the canyon site could be built as <br />turn their findings over to the City Manager for further action. Mr. Eugune Howell, <br />cheaply or as safely as the No. 1 site. Mr. Jain wanted it understood that they <br />County Public Health Engineer, was present at the August 3rd meeting and agreed <br />i, <br />did not object to the Committees report, but they did not agree that the canyon <br />i <br />that either site could be made safe from polution. City Engineer Jain was also <br />site could be built at a saving even though acquisition costs might be less. They <br />did agree to two things: (1) a reservoir could be built in the canyon, and (2) <br />that it could be made safe at a cost unknown at present. <br />t7 <br />Councilman Jones stated he had come to the conclusion that the engineer had no <br />I <br />objections to the lower site.. In his opinion, it appeared that the City could <br />acquire the Jefferson Avenue site at no cost, and that they must acquire the site <br />at the rear of the hospital. He then asked if it was possible to build ori the lower <br />site and put the money now available into the site in back of the hospital. City <br />I� <br />Engineer Jain replied that he would not object to the Canyon site, but he could not <br />let the inference be made in the committee report that he had agreed that the res- <br />ervoir in the canyon can be built as cheaply as on the Farm Hills site. <br />Councilman Granger stated that his letter was based on the August 3rd meeting and <br />at that time there were no objections from those attending. This matter is now <br />an administrative problem, and it is the thought of the committee that they should <br />turn their findings over to the City Manager for further action. Mr. Eugune Howell, <br />County Public Health Engineer, was present at the August 3rd meeting and agreed <br />that either site could be made safe from polution. City Engineer Jain was also <br />present at this meeting. Out of this meeting, committee report was written. <br />Councilman Granger was directed to write this report and he stated he did not have <br />Mr. Adamson's letter dated August 3rd at the time the report was written. <br />, <br />City Engineer Jain stated.that there had not been any comparative cost studies <br />f <br />made. Councilman Royer stated that with the facts at hand, Mr. Rolison should <br />be able to make some recommendation to the Council in regard to this matter. This <br />is a possible solution to secure two sites as there is only sufficient funds avail- <br />able at present to acquire one. Councilman Jones asked Mr. Jain, in his opinion, <br />3 <br />which of the two reservoirs would be the most important, the one on Farm Hills or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.