My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
■I <br />144 <br />that on March 19, 1956, the Council turned down Iatr. Hunts request for a water meter on this same <br />property. Water Superintendent Winter was of the opinion that if this matter was checked with the <br />Health Department they would find that the building permit seas granted with the understanding that they <br />would have to get by with the well. The first permit was granted by the Health Department in March, <br />1953, and when the well went dry the City Council, on July 13, 1953, approved the present water meter be- <br />cause it was a hardship case. In December of 1954, Mr. Hunt built the second house, and it was the <br />. y <br />opinion of Mr. Winter that the Health Department told Mr. Hunt that he would have to depend on the well <br />for his water. This is the same property that Mr. Hunt threatened to take to court if he hasn't given <br />a water meter. Councilman Britschgi moved that the request be denied, seconded by Councilman Granger. <br />City Attorney Currie asked that it be noted that at the time that this request is before the Council <br />that these people are only considering the purchase +of the property and have not completed the sale. a <br />The motion carried because this was not considered a hardship case. <br />Councilman Britschgi left the meeting at 9:12 P. M. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REGARDING FINAL MAP, FARM HILLS NO. 2. <br />The Planning Commission recommended approval of final map of Farm Hills No. 2 subject to the following <br />conditions: <br />1. Completionofmathematical checking and correction of errors. <br />2. Deed parcels B, C, D and E at end of dead-end streets. <br />3. Furnish performance bond of IP450,000 and execute agreemtn. <br />The City Engineer recommended that the final map of Farm Hills No. 2 be accepted subject to the following <br />conditions& <br />1. Completion of mathematical checking of Final Map, and correction of any errors found. <br />2. Deeding of parcels indentified as Lots "B", "C", "D" and "E", at ends of deadend streets, <br />to City of Redwood City, simultaneously vrith recording of map. E " <br />3. Furnishing performance bond in the amount of $450,000 which has been agreed to by the <br />subdivider. <br />li. Execution of Agreement covering construction of improvements, etc., now being prepared by <br />the City Attorney. <br />Councilman Herkner moved approval of the Planning Commission's recommendations subject tothe donditions, <br />seconded by Councilman Granger. Councilman Stout wanted to knorr if the Park and Recreation Commission <br />had reviewed the. -map and, if so, had they made any recommendations. The City Attorney stated that there <br />was no legal reason why this map should be turned over to the Park and Recreation -Commission. Gerry <br />verrsen, Park and Recreation Commissioner, stated that, -though they have not seen the final map, they had <br />talked with Oddstad Homes and everything was in order. Notion carried. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND ANNEXATION I9ESTERLY PORTION FARM HILLS N0. 4. Herb Frahm, representing Oddstad <br />Homes, presented a topographical map only, He stated that this had been presented informally to the <br />Planning Commission.and that was the way he would like this considered nmv. This was not a formal <br />petition for annexation. The City Attorney stated that there were two things to be considered: (1) <br />the gentlemenfs agreement with Woodside and (2) whether or not this was included in the proposed incdrp- <br />oration of Woodside. Councilman Herkner moved approval of the Planning Commission's thinking on this <br />matter, seconded by Councilman Granger. This was followed by discussion after which the motion carried. <br />Gerry Verrsen, Park and Recreation Commissioner, stated the Izzy Gold was elected as State President of the <br />Junior Chamber of Commerce. He asked -if the Council would go on record of congratulating Izzy. Council <br />man Granger moved that the City Clerk write a letter of congratulations, seconded by Councilman Stout and <br />carried. <br />CATHERINE BRENNAN APPOINTMENT TO SARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION. Councilman Stout moved that Catherine Brennan <br />I . I <br />r. -_n <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.