My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
192 <br />that there are no provision in the Building Code providing for the refund of fees paid for building per- <br />mits and thqrefore there would be no legal authority for refund. <br />Councilman Stout moved that the item be removed from the agenda, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and <br />carried. <br />BUILDING AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS REPORT ON VETERAN$ BUILDING, WARREN & STANDISH STREETS. The Clerk read the <br />following report submitted by the Building Inspector: 73 <br />Following are the approximate costs as requested, for the Veterans Building. �R <br />1. <br />New continuous foundation <br />$ 33100 <br />2. <br />Replace existing roofing <br />2,500 <br />3- <br />Stucco exterior structure <br />1,850 <br />4. <br />Painting of new woodwork <br />200._ <br />5- <br />Provide one exit for small meeting room ) <br />paper which deteriorate rapidly. <br />I <br />Provide one hour protection of vent ) <br />These may be microfilmed and made safe <br />from deterioration, fire, water, etc- <br />duck in main hall ) <br />400 <br />Replace porch at kitchen area ) <br />E <br />6. <br />The contractors costs, taxes, insurance, <br />one location to another at considerable <br />etc., plus his percentage of profit <br />less expense than original documents- <br />on job makes a grand total of <br />$10,441 . <br />The Engineerts services as to the structural inspection of the building, plus <br />plans would possibly run to several hundred dollars. <br />The estimated cost per square footage to replace a place of its kind would be <br />$6.00 per Sq. Ft. $20,000 to $25,000 to replace this building would be a likely <br />estimate. <br />In order to make the plumbing comply to the Redwood City Plumbing Code$ it <br />would necessitate an expenditure of approximately $700. <br />Very tryly yours, <br />S. H. Kreiss, Building Inspector <br />Councilman Herkner moved that the building not be rented for the purpose as requested for the nursery <br />school. This was followed by discussion as to whether or not this building could be rented out to <br />9 <br />other organizations. Fire Marshal Asvos stated that this building can not comply to Fire Zone No. 2. <br />Councilman Granger seconded the motion. This was followed by further discussion. Councilman Britschgi �I <br />P L�� <br />was of the opinion that the City could possibly tear down part of the building and just leave the meet- <br />ing room and the kitchen and rent this out or lend it out as a meeting room. The motion carried. <br />Councilman Stout wanted to know if the figures quoted were minimum or maximum figures. The Mayor <br />appointed Councilmen Stout and Granger as a committee to study this matter and report back to the Council <br />in three weeks, July 9th. <br />CITY CLERK REPORT ON PROPOSED MICROFILMING RECORDS. The Clerk made the following report: <br />We have made inquiries regarding the possible expense to install microfilming of vital records. <br />League of California Cities did not have anything•on had other than a record of the program <br />as submitted by City Clerk of El Monte, California, who has been microfilming for the past <br />two years. The following comments will indicate the feeling of the E1 Monte authorities: < <br />1- Saves space releasing filing equipment for more active records. <br />2. <br />Better protection and preservation of <br />vital records. Duplicate film <br />can be copied and stored in vaults or <br />other safe places. <br />3- <br />Some permanent records are on inferior <br />paper which deteriorate rapidly. <br />I <br />These may be microfilmed and made safe <br />from deterioration, fire, water, etc- <br />G <br />' <br />4- <br />Microfilmed records may be moved from <br />one location to another at considerable <br />less expense than original documents- <br />; <br />5. Departments are relieved from responsibility for car of obsolete records. <br />El Monte has used the Recordak Junior which is a combination 16mm machine and film reader, <br />very compact in a single cabinet approximately 3 feet square. 100 foot roll of film will <br />record 6 minute books and indexes. This film will also record 3000 letter size documents. <br />Price of equipment is approximately $900 and film at $3.80 per roll. <br />Councilman Stout moved .that this matter be referred to the City Manager for consideration at budget <br />time, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried. , <br />STATUS OF ENGRAVING NAME PLATES FOR PRESENTATION TO OUTGOING OFFICIALS. Due to the fact that some of the <br />name plates for out -going City officials were either damaged or otherwise not suitable for the purpose <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.