BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17

Browse Search

We therefore ask your consideration of our request to extend the time of occupant' of the 221 Ross Garage and adjoining property, as outlined in the City Attorney's letter of May 4, 1956, from June 15, 1956 to August 15, 1956• "Pete't Towne asked that the dates in this letter be changed to read from July. 15, 1956 to August 6, 1956. Oscar Holmes agreed to the extension provided he will be given an extension of 15 working days on the contract, and that the Council will back him up if the building is not ready to start wrecking on August 6th. City Attorney Currie stated that this should be considered as two dif£ei;ent items. Oscar Holmes stated that August 6th should be the latest date because of the time element concerning the stormy season. Councilman Britschgi moved that Towne Motor Company be given an extension to Ai}gust 6th and Oscar Holmes be -given an extension of 15 working days to coyppensate for the loss of time and the City to back up Mr. Holmes. City Engineer Jain stated that the City will be obligated to pay the additional three weeks time for inspection i� costs. Councilman Weiss made an amendment to the motion that Mr. Towne reimburse the City for any inspection costs due to this delay. Councilman Granger questioned the cost of inspectors during the delay and the cost dul7ing the three week extension: Councilman Stout stated that there is an extra cost and he thought that possible Mr. Towne could pay a porion of the inspectors .fee and therefore Councilman Stout seconded the motion. Councilman Spillers stated that the few property owners have been contacted and they did not object to the delay so he was of the opinion that the City should pay the additional cost. Mr. Towne stated that he would talk with the Council on this matter, however, he did not like the idea of having to pay an add- itional $400. The amendment lost on roll call with Councilmen Britschgi, Granger, Spillers and Mayor Royer voing No and Councilman Herkner being noted absent. The Mayor called for a roll call vote on the original motion. Councilman Granger stated that he thought that there was some other approach that could be made in this situation and he did not vote NO just to favor Mr. Towne. Councilman Weiss spoke in regard to the City having to dray additional funds and he was of the opinion that this should be taken into consideration. This was followed ley discussion. The original motion L. carried on roll call with Councilman Herkner being noted absent. Mr. Towne thanked Mr. Holmes for his consideration in this matter and the Nyaor told Mr. Holmes that the Council was pleased with the progress of his work on the parking lgt. PERSONAL APPEARANCE, R. G. HUNT REGARDING EMERALD LAKE WATER CONNECTION. Mr. Hunt stated that he wanted permis- sion to move the water meter from the present location to his adjoining property. He said he }"as a prospec- tive purchaser for this property. The water meter services 4152 Jefferson Avenue and he wants to transfer this meter to 4160 Jefferson. Councilman Spillers stated that Mr. Hunt had asked for water service because his well went dry. Mr. Hunt stated that the old home can be serviced by the well. Councilman Spillers stated that he well not agree to transfer this water service now and then have Mr. Hunt come back and tell the Council that his well has gone dry and he wants a new,connection. Water Superintendent H. L. W-nter stated that as far as the Water Department is concerned they would not object to transferring this connection, however, the City should protect themselves against possible damage suits if the allow this meter to be moved, leaving Mr. Huntts home to be serviced by well water only. Councilman Britschgi moved that this water meter be transfered from 4152 to 4160 Jefferson Avenue subject to the conditions stated by the Water Superintendent. Councilman Granger stated that he was, of the ppinion that this property will be sold to another property owner. This should be handled by the new owner, Mr. Miller, rather than Mr. Hunt. City Attorney Currie stated thnt it did not make any difference who the property owner was because the meter will be for the property and the home owner. The conditions are (1) that they can not sercie 4152 Jefferson Avenue from the "later meter after it is moved to 1.x160 Jefferson Avenue, and (2) an agreement be made by Idr. Aunt giving the City permission to take the Crater away from him so that the City will not be held responsible. Councilman Britschgi asked to reword his motion so that the Council s ould suggest: that Mr. Miller come before the Council in person asking for a change in relocat- ing the water meter. By doing this then the Council could bind the property owner so that he can not