My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
This a 2 3 7 <br />ppeal serves to focus attention on this type of procedure. I consider the matter of , <br />sufficient import and believe it merits a thorough exploration and determination with a <br />view to the establishment of a definite policy that will apply not only to the instant <br />case, but equally to all cases of a similar nature. I feel that we should take this matter <br />under advisement, give it a thorough examination at a study meeting. <br />Councilman Weiss moved that this matter be carried on the agenda until such times say one month, as,they <br />can establish a uniform policy applicable to this and future cases$ seconded by Councilman Stout. This <br />was followed by a lengtby discussion which was almost a repeat of the previous discussion in regard to <br />set back lines$ and dedication of 101 strip for future street widening. The motion lost on roll call with <br />Councilmen Grangers Herkners Spill@rs and Mayor Royer voting NO. <br />Councilman Granger moved that the minutes of this topic be referred to the Planning Commission so that <br />they might study and bring in a recommendation toward the establishment of a policy so that the Council may <br />Ihave something to go by on this and all similar matters, seconded by Councilman Herkner. Councilman Weiss <br />P. <br />stated that he did not see that the Planning Commission should set the policy for the Council to follows if <br />arWthing, it should be the other way arounde The Mayor said that the Planning Commission was not being - <br />asked to set a policy$ but they were merely asked to make a recommendation on policy matters. The motion <br />carried. <br />Councilman Granger moved to carry this on the agenda for 30 dayss seconded by Councilman Britschgi and <br />carried. <br />PUBLIC HEARING$ BID OPENING., MANZANITA-LAUREL-HILTON continued from earlier in the evening. Engineer Moen <br />reported that the low bidder was Douglass and Woodhouse with a bid of $29A81e39e Councilman Herkner <br />offered RESOLUTION 2071 AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO DOUGLASS AND WOODHOUSE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO MANZANITA- <br />LAUREL-HILTON STREETS and moved its adoptions seconded by Councilman Stout and carried on roll, call. <br />Councilman Britschgi moved that the Clerk return deposits$ if arWs to the unsuccessful bidderss seconded <br />fun by Councilman Weiss and carried. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, HILLTOP DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS, continuted'from earlier in the evening. Affidavit of publications <br />l , <br />mailing and posting was ordered filed. The Clerk read a letter of protests from Robert Ae Webber$ Lot'49 <br />Carmelita Manors wherein he stated that if said improvements are made to Hilltop Drives without first tak— <br />ing care of the run -.off waters from Eaton Avenue, his house will be setting in a lake if the bail floods of <br />last winter and several winters prior to that are repeated. Mre Webber also stated in his letter that acme <br />01 <br />Of the residents along Hilltop Drive enjoy the rural atmosphere and should they be forced to accept the <br />51 sidewalks they will no longer have a rural setting. <br />Mrs* Gwendolyn Fitzpatrick (112 Hilltop Drive) protested this action on the basis of previous assessment <br />for street improvements in 1939. She further stated in her letter that the City itself surfaced this <br />street and a ssessed the property owners for its with the understanding that the City would maintain it. <br />The Mayor asked that Engineer Moen answer the questions as they came up in the letters. Mr. Moen stated <br />that the engineers have considered all these problems and have tried to establish a grade to fit the exist- <br />ing yard as close as possible. Mr. Webber stated,that he was against sidewalks in this area and he did <br />not believe that this street was going to do his drainage any good and will probably do away with his <br />natural drainage. The question of sewage stopping up and backing up into the home of Mr. Carlisle was <br />discussed. <br />The mayor asked Mr. Moen to check into this matter. Mr. Carlisle wanted this problem settled before the <br />streets were improved. <br />The Clerk read a letter from Mrs. Ruth E. Sawyer, 102 Hilltop Drive, wherein she stated that she protested <br />the plans for the elaborate street improvement of Hilltop Drive between Eaton Avenue and Alameda de las <br />Pulgas. She feels that assessment for the street would be much greater than the increase in the value of <br />her property. Mrs. Sawyer further stated in her letter that she agress that some improvement could and <br />should be made on the Alameda de las Pul.gas end of Hilltop Drive. The lower and of the street has served <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.