Laserfiche WebLink
249 <br />have a study meeting'at the earliest possible date after which the motion carried. Councilman Stout <br />suggested that the Mayor make a priority list of the items for study. The Mayor announced that the Council <br />was going to have a study meeting on Wednesday to study Councilman Stout's that the Council was going to have <br />a study meeting on -Wednesday to study Councilman Stout's report in regard to annexation and subdivision <br />fees and the following week the Park and Recreation Commission has asked that they be allowed to,meet with <br />the Council on the matter of a master plan for Stulsa£t Park. This matter could be taken up between 9 and <br />I' <br />1 10 p. me if it was agreeable with the rest of the Council. This was followed by aaery lengthy and heated <br />argument between Councilman Britschgi and Weiss^in regard to action taken in study meetings. <br />CITY MANAGER'S REPORT ON LIGHTS AT ENTRANCE OF REDWOOD VILLAGE. The Clerk read the City Manager's report wherein <br />it stated that the Pacific Gas and Electric Company installed a 6000 lumen light on the ple across from the <br />entrance. This was done on Monday, August 6, and the present lighting appears to be adequate. <br />COUNCILMAN STOUT'S REPORT ON THE BRANCH LIBRARY. The Clerk read the following report: The Council Library <br />Committee is pleased to report that the Plans and Specifications for the new Branch Library to be located <br />on the Roosevelt School property, are completed and ready for the calling of bids. <br />The City Council authorized the City Manager, April 23rd last, to employ an architect to prepare the plans <br />and specifications — the firm of Green and Erskine was subsequently employed. <br />The location for this new addition to our Library System was selected by the Library Board and Committee, <br />approved by the Council, as it would serve not only the new Terrace areas but also the older part of the <br />City down to the vicinity of Community Park. The use of the School property thru a lease with the Board of <br />Trustees will be a saving to the taxpayers. <br />In the preparation of the plans and specifications and Architdct and Engineer have worked very closely <br />with the Library Board to obtain for Redwood City a building that would meet the needs of the community <br />and still stay within the limits of the funds available. <br />The funds available are: <br />9625,633.39 Schaberg Fund <br />12,9220.00 1944 Bonds <br />93'l,o53.3Y TOTAL <br />All frills and extras were left out and econonV of design prevailed yet giving the community a Branch <br />Library all of Redwood City -should be proud of. <br />Faced with a rising market and possible higher costs the Architect provided three alternates that can be <br />deleted by the City Council should the bids prove higher than funds available. However, it is the hope of <br />the Board and the committee that this will not happen. <br />The alternates are. <br />1. Deduct block planter and concrete ramp in front — estimated cost $350.00 to $400.00. <br />2. Omitting a portion of the ramp at the rear and the stairs to the basement, basement doors and <br />windows and compete finishing of basement — estimated cost $1,200.00 — $1,500.00. <br />3. Omitting folding door between washroom and lounge — estimated cost $150.00 to $200.00 <br />1� Total estimated cost of alternates — $1,800.00 — $2,9000.00 <br />The plans and specifications have been checked and approved by our Building Inspector, Mr. Kreiss. The <br />City Attorney has reviewed the specifications and corrections made to his satisfaction. <br />Attached herewith is a letter from the Library Board Chairman, Mr. Patten and minutes of the Board's <br />most recent meeting (August 10, 1956) approving the plans and specifications. <br />Council Library Committee <br />Councilmen Stout and Weiss <br />Councilman Stout, Chairman <br />Councilman Stout stated that there were three alternates in his report, however, there was one more <br />alternate to be added and that was requested by the Building Inspector which was that the contractor should <br />be asked to build a bonded roof. This would mean an additional cost of approximately $300 to $400. Council— <br />