My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
270 <br />In regard to the obstruction of drainage, w hich question was raised by Mrs. Carolla, raising of the <br />sidewalks to curb grade well not obstruct drainage any more than existing conditions, particulary if, <br />pipe drains are installed under the sidewalk. <br />It will not be practicable for the City to install its portion of sidewalk and driveways on the south <br />side of the street until the property owners are in process of doing their portion of the work, due to <br />the difference in grades. Apparently that is the reason why these.driveways and portions of sidewalk <br />were not constructed when the street was reconstructed in 1950, and also the fact that gas tax funds I <br />could hot be used for sidewalk and driveway construction. <br />Councilman Britschgi moved that the City Engineer' s, report be accepted and it be followed through. <br />This was followed by discussion.. City Engineer Jain stated that he could not do the work until the <br />people do their part. The motion was seconded by Councilman Spillers. Councilman Herkner recommended <br />that the City Manager contact the people and give them this information and tell them that the City <br />will do the work at the same time they do their own work. Mrs. Inez Carolla stated that there was <br />additional sidewalk which the City should pay for. She spoke in regard to the sidewalk being 6" below <br />the cur. Mr. Jain stated that this was so, the City will take this into consideration at the time. <br />Councilman Britschgi included in his motion to take care of this 8 or 10' which is below the curb. <br />This was followed by discussion in regard to the drainage problem in the area. There is no storm drain <br />in this vicinity. Mr. Jain stated that the owners should get their own contractor. The motion carried. <br />REAL ESTATE COMMITTEE RE=MENDED ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER <br />OF DIVISION OF <br />HIGHWAYS FOR <br />TWO PARCELS <br />ON NEW FREEWAY. <br />Councilman Granger stated that he had turned in a <br />letter in the <br />proper form <br />and asked the <br />Clerk to read <br />same. The report reads as follows: <br />The Committee has review the offer of the Division of Highways on the two parcels covered by <br />Grant deeds #15482, 10466-1 and 10466-2. <br />r-- <br />The offer on deed #15482, more specifically described as a 2.225 acre piece lying between L� <br />the Animal Shelter and Sewage Treatment,Plant, is.$24,670 and the committee recommends its acceptance. <br />The offer on deeds 10466-1 and 10466-21 more specifically referred to as an irregular <br />parcel bounded by present Bayshore, Harbor Boulvevard and City Limits line, is $638,100 <br />together with a deed to City for a parcel approximately 50' x 100' adjoinging Redwood <br />City Corporation Yard and presently leased by us form the State. The Committee recommends <br />its acceptance. <br />Although it is not within the committee's provice to recommend, they which to call the <br />attention of the proper city authorities to some of the conditions in the deeds in order <br />that they may take appropriate steps to protect the City's rights and anticipated require- <br />ments for proper operation of City facilities. <br />Councilman Herkner moved that the report be accepted, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried. <br />REAL ESTATE COMMITTEE RECOMMEND SALE OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 46 REESE SUBDIVISION (CORNER <br />REDWOOD AVENUE AND SIERRA STREET). The Real Estate Committee set the minimum price at $1,500. <br />Mr. Jain stated that they should keep the lot because the creek runs through the middle of the lot <br />and they should keep the lot for creek widening and straightening, however, under the circumstances <br />he believes that the City could sell the property and keep an easement rather than pplit the lot. <br />' <br />This was folllowed by discussion. Councilman Weiss moved to advertise the lot for sale at the <br />minimum price subject to the easement, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED DENIAL TENTATIVE MAP OF OAKLEY TRACT (REVISION NO. 4) ON GROUNDS THAT <br />A CULT -DE -SAC WOULD BE TOO LONG. The Fire Department received demerits for too many long cul-de-sacs <br />in the city. This results in dncreases in Fire Underwriter Insurance rates and in turn affects the <br />entire City. <br />Councilman Weiss read the following prepared statement: <br />Your Honor - this question is a prime example of,what can and usually does happen <br />when we endeavor to perform such improtant duties as we are called upon to perform for <br />the people. <br />The fact of the matter is that now that I have been able to explore this proposition a <br />little more thoroughly, I can sympathize with our planning commissioners for their chagrin <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.