BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17

Browse Search

X02 at the rear, the six foot fences,to be constructed at a 450 angle acreoss this 10 foot public utility easement. These fences wbu18 be reconstructed and remain as non -conform- ing uses with respect to the present fence ordinance aspertains to corner lots. Those present at -the meeting were: Chairman, Councilman Robert V. Spillers and Council- man Weiss; Mr. Vincent Guida, developer; Mr. Charles Randlett, engineer for the developer; Glenn M. Jain, City Engineer; and several property owners residing -on Virginia Avenue, including Mr. Robert Kilcline and Mrs. William Cathay, who own the lost adjacent to Lot 6. _ Councilman Britschgi moved approval of the: recommendation, seconded by Councilman Spillers. Mr. Kilcline spoke for Mrs. Cathery and requested that the sidewalk be moved away from the fence. This was followed by discussion, The City Engineer was asked to contact Mr. Cathey. Also under dis- cussion was whether or not the 36 foot street would be wide enough. The Fire Chief stated that this would be ample for the fire equipment as long as there wasn't any parking on the street. Weiss read the following prepared statement. It is not my intention to interpose any objection to the mode of settlement that is being proposed, -since it appears to be the recommendation of the committee, and since I am cognizant that said recommendation is thesesult of a somewhat confused$ reluctant and abject surrender in disgust -of the people involved. The property in question must be developed, we have had ample delays in arriving at this solution, it is therefor not ny purpose to thwart the will of the majority, but I must in conscience express my views on the matter. The proposed solution will create certain nonconforming -usage of certain properties, the worst of it is that it may also well set a precedent for certain other properties to be developed in that area ..in the near future; and for all purposes and intents I am doubtful that the good planning for the future welfare of the community or the people on either side of uthe proposed opening into Virginal would permit such a development. Because of said reasons, and others that I could readily offer, I shall be constrained to vote NO on the question. Councilman there being no further protests or comments, the motion carried on roll call with Councilman Weiss voting N0. REPORT ON BIDS FCR AIR COMPRESSOR, STREET DEPARTMENT. The Clerk read the following letter submitted by the'City Engineer: re: Bids - Air Compressor - Street Department Bids received on September 28 1956 for portables six a finder gasoline P a s P s Y s operated, 125 CFM, rotary type air compressor for the Street Maintenance Department, are summarized as follows: Edward R. Bacon Company Jaeger, Model 125 $4,056.14 It is our recommendation that the bid of Edward R. Bacon Company be accepted. This equipment was specified to be equipment with a 6 cylinder engine, based upon our experience with both 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder equipment of this type, the last two compressors purchased by the city within the last year being 6 cylinder. The city departments now using air compressor equipment are convinced that the 6 cylinder engine is the most satisfactory for the folowing reasons: 1. Quicker recovery of both volume and pressure under heavy loads. 2. Slower speed under normal and maximum loads. 3. Quieter and smoother operation at all times, which is particularly important where equipment is being used in residential and commercial areas to avoid disturbance. 4. Less wear and maintenance due to slow motor. operation. 5. . Lower horsepower necessary. 6. Quieter ^operation during warm up periods, particulary when being used in residential neighborhoods. We have checked with certain private contractors who also recommend the use of 6 cylinder equipment wherever possible for the same reasons listed above. Glenn M. Jain The City Manager stated that while he had hoped to receive more than one bid from the legal advertisement, it was apparent from the detailed statement submitted by the city Engineer, that it would be advantageous to the City to purchase this equipment, for which funds are provided in the budget. Since the City Engineer also advised that this equipment is badly needed, the City Manager concurred in his recommendation. Councilman Spillers moved apppoval of the recommendation, 0 I