Laserfiche WebLink
S 6 6 i6 r <br />CITY MANAGER REPORT ON MATTERS PENDING BEFORE THE COUNCIL. The Clerk read the report. The Mayor announced <br />0 <br />that the Council will undertake to consider three of these matters a week until they complete the list. <br />Councilman Weiss referred to item 5 of the City Manager's report and stated that Middlefield Road <br />and Jefferson Avenue do not intersect at Bayshore. He then read the following prepared statement: <br />There is no question but that the city managers response tm my statement of <br />December 17, 1956, relative to matters pending before the council places the onus <br />right wher it belongs. <br />It should be remembered that in my calling attention to these items, I did not <br />call or request the city managers comments, on the contrary I urged that vie the <br />council take steps to dispose of them and clear our agenda of all unfinished business <br />at the earliest practicable date. <br />At this time I again call attention to the fact that the list in question is but <br />a partial one and covers only some of the more important items. If desired I can <br />furnish,the Mayor with an additional list of some 20 or more items that should <br />also be cleared at an early date. <br />It isimy thinking that this matter in its entirety should be handled by the <br />council by meeting more frequently until such time as they are cleared from our <br />agenda. <br />Louis- 'Pleiss, Councilman <br />The Mayor stated that the most important items will be taken care of first and he was of the opinion <br />that the City had their own list of items on the tickler file and he did not think that Councilman <br />Weiss would be required to furnish one also. Mr. Thomas Tuite, Jr. spoke about item 14 on the City <br />Manager's report. He stated that he wanted to see an overall report from the City Manager on the <br />parking lot and the information that he had previously asked for. This was followed by discussion. <br />9 <br />Councilman Granger suggested that the Council appoint a committee to go over these items and decide <br />which one would be considered first and the rest of the Council to abide by the Committees decision. <br />It was the consensus of opinion that the Mayor would be allowed to set up his own list for consid- <br />eration. <br />CITY MANAGER REPORT ON CINNABAR MINING CONTRACT <br />The Clerk read the report which was follmved by dis- <br />cussion. The City Manager stated that an agreement should be made. The Mayor directed the City <br />Manager to see that this was done. Councilman Weiss read the following prepared statement: <br />Mr. Mayor and gentlemen - I have read the okay managers report a copy of which has <br />been furnished each of us, I have also listened attentively .to its present reading. <br />The imprtance of the question undoubtedly is appreciated by all of us. <br />I am not an attorney, but I'have over the years had a great deal of experience <br />with purchase agreements and various types of contracts and have learned that great <br />care and caution must be exercised in their execution, especially where public funds <br />and the public interest is involved. Naturally I am desireous of being very cautious <br />in all such matters as a representative of the people. <br />i <br />1 <br />Some of the factors not covered in the city managers report, nor in my statement <br />of December 17, 1956, but which facts I have been able to ascertain from Press <br />clippings on civic matters that I have gathered over the years, I am able to state <br />that bids were called for an received prior to October 1955, that before acceptance <br />of the highest and most advantageous bid, the matter was referred to Council Cinnabar <br />Committee for study and recommendation, that during such study one of the bidders <br />was permitted to revise his proposal, that thereafter on or about October 31, 1955, <br />the Council on the recommendation of the Cinnabar Committee accepted said revised bids ' <br />as being the most favorable to the cities interests. <br />In recent weeks it developed that notwithstanding the foregoing no formal <br />agreement has subsequently been entered into, though apparantly such was the intent; <br />furth it appears that the purpotedly successful bidder has not to date performed any <br />activity under the purported agreement or award, that he has on December 17, 1956, <br />through a representative indicated his willingness to have a formal agreement prepared <br />and executed, stipulating certain conditions that may or may not have been a part of <br />the of the original agreement. I <br />No doubt there are many other factors involved, such as, apparent lack of records <br />indicating specific details of original negotiations, it appears that even the city <br />manager was ,only able to furnish only the rather brief statement as contained in <br />council minutes of October 31, 1955, and now recommends inclusion of several very <br />pertinent and improtant provisions in the agreement that is to be executed. <br />All of this leads me to believe that any action in this matters has to be care- <br />fully ana7y z3d and scrutinized to avoid endangering the rights of either party <br />