My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />399 <br />referred to the changing of the $1.00 limitation to 75¢. The City Attorney replied that there wasn't <br />anything in the Charter which stated that.the Council has to tax the x$1.00 limitation. <br />Councilman Stout offered introduction of the disposition ordinance, seconded by Councilman Weiss. This was <br />followed by discussion and the City Attorney recommended that they first consider the other ordinances in <br />order. The motion was withdrawn. <br />retailers, providing for the collection and paying of such tax, and prescribing penalties for violations <br />of the provisions hereof. While the City Attorney was reading the proposed ordinance, the Mayor interrupted <br />him to ask if everyone in the audience could hear. When it was found out that they could hear, the City <br />Attorney proceeded with the reading. Mr. V. Marchi, 1807 Maddux Drive, asked the Council what assurance <br />they had that the mjority of the citizens of the City of Redwood City wanted the sales tax and on w hat <br />grounds did the Counci feel justified in proceeding with the sales tax. This was followed by discussion <br />after which Councilman Stout read several articles which appeared in the Tribune in regard to the sales <br />tax. Lionel Baldwin apposed the sales tax and asked several questions and stated his opinion. This was <br />followed by discussion. Councilman Granger spoke on the subject of his stand in regard to the sales tax. <br />Hes suggested that the people in the audience weigh the situation from both sides and if they did this <br />he felt sure they could see the advisablility of the sales tax. Councilman Granger outlined possible uses <br />the money could be put to if the City had sufficient funds to do the projects. He feels the only way the <br />City could get the necessary funds is from a sales tax. He stressed the pay as you go method. <br />In answer to questions asked of him, Councilman Weymouth stated that he was not an elected official, but <br />had been appointed to fill theterm of Councilman Britschgi. He feels that sales tax is the only method <br />available for funds. The City needs more funds and he stated his thinking on the matter of sales tax. It <br />is his opinion that the major taxpayer will be given a break because of the sales tax and they will benefit <br />from this tax rather then be hurt.. He feels that it is equitable a tax as the City can get and he feels <br />that the City needs funds to operate. This was followed discussion. Councilman Spillers stated that he <br />has been against the sales tax from the beginning and he feels that it should be put on the ballot for a <br />vote. <br />James Fait, 513 Carlos Avenue, spoke on the subject of the sales tax. A. H. Davies spoke against the sales <br />tax. Mr. Chester Lebsack, representing the Automobile Dealers Association and the Retail Merchants stated <br />that he had a petition from 320 merchants opposing the sales tax. His group does not object so much to the <br />sales tax but they feel that the Council should place the matter of the sales tax before the people for a <br />vote. He stated his own his group's reasoning for his statement. The public utilities would be given <br />approximately a 30% reduction in taxes if this sales tax is put into effect. He suggested that the Council <br />adopt the proposed ordinance he had drawn up and which was printed in the newspaper with approximately 700 <br />people endorsing the ordinance.. This was followed by considerable discussion. <br />Dick Harris, 166 Anamor Street, Spoke and stated that he was representing the American Manufactures Associ <br />The Association, comprising of 220 industrial firms, requested that the Council not adopt the sales tax of <br />1% as they feel that this tax is a penalty to the business man and would discorage expansion. Stephen <br />Serfozo, 196 Columbia Avenue, representing the Painters Union and the Building Trade Council, objected to <br />the Sales Tax. <br />Paul Jones expressed a vote of confidence to the Councilmen. He backed Councilman Granger up on his <br />statement in regard to cutting down the budget and inviting a Citizen's Committee to be formed to study the <br />matter. The ;$1.00 limit has almost been reached. Mr. Jones told the merchants that it wasn't the sales <br />tax that would drive the people to shop elsewhere but,it.was their own merchandising. People shopped out <br />of Redwood City because they couldn't find the merchandise they wanted here. <br />The Mayor asked <br />the <br />City Attorney to read <br />the.proposed ordinance of <br />the City•of Redwood City <br />imposing a <br />license tax for <br />the <br />privilege of selling <br />tangible personal property <br />at retail, providing for <br />permits to <br />retailers, providing for the collection and paying of such tax, and prescribing penalties for violations <br />of the provisions hereof. While the City Attorney was reading the proposed ordinance, the Mayor interrupted <br />him to ask if everyone in the audience could hear. When it was found out that they could hear, the City <br />Attorney proceeded with the reading. Mr. V. Marchi, 1807 Maddux Drive, asked the Council what assurance <br />they had that the mjority of the citizens of the City of Redwood City wanted the sales tax and on w hat <br />grounds did the Counci feel justified in proceeding with the sales tax. This was followed by discussion <br />after which Councilman Stout read several articles which appeared in the Tribune in regard to the sales <br />tax. Lionel Baldwin apposed the sales tax and asked several questions and stated his opinion. This was <br />followed by discussion. Councilman Granger spoke on the subject of his stand in regard to the sales tax. <br />Hes suggested that the people in the audience weigh the situation from both sides and if they did this <br />he felt sure they could see the advisablility of the sales tax. Councilman Granger outlined possible uses <br />the money could be put to if the City had sufficient funds to do the projects. He feels the only way the <br />City could get the necessary funds is from a sales tax. He stressed the pay as you go method. <br />In answer to questions asked of him, Councilman Weymouth stated that he was not an elected official, but <br />had been appointed to fill theterm of Councilman Britschgi. He feels that sales tax is the only method <br />available for funds. The City needs more funds and he stated his thinking on the matter of sales tax. It <br />is his opinion that the major taxpayer will be given a break because of the sales tax and they will benefit <br />from this tax rather then be hurt.. He feels that it is equitable a tax as the City can get and he feels <br />that the City needs funds to operate. This was followed discussion. Councilman Spillers stated that he <br />has been against the sales tax from the beginning and he feels that it should be put on the ballot for a <br />vote. <br />James Fait, 513 Carlos Avenue, spoke on the subject of the sales tax. A. H. Davies spoke against the sales <br />tax. Mr. Chester Lebsack, representing the Automobile Dealers Association and the Retail Merchants stated <br />that he had a petition from 320 merchants opposing the sales tax. His group does not object so much to the <br />sales tax but they feel that the Council should place the matter of the sales tax before the people for a <br />vote. He stated his own his group's reasoning for his statement. The public utilities would be given <br />approximately a 30% reduction in taxes if this sales tax is put into effect. He suggested that the Council <br />adopt the proposed ordinance he had drawn up and which was printed in the newspaper with approximately 700 <br />people endorsing the ordinance.. This was followed by considerable discussion. <br />Dick Harris, 166 Anamor Street, Spoke and stated that he was representing the American Manufactures Associ <br />The Association, comprising of 220 industrial firms, requested that the Council not adopt the sales tax of <br />1% as they feel that this tax is a penalty to the business man and would discorage expansion. Stephen <br />Serfozo, 196 Columbia Avenue, representing the Painters Union and the Building Trade Council, objected to <br />the Sales Tax. <br />Paul Jones expressed a vote of confidence to the Councilmen. He backed Councilman Granger up on his <br />statement in regard to cutting down the budget and inviting a Citizen's Committee to be formed to study the <br />matter. The ;$1.00 limit has almost been reached. Mr. Jones told the merchants that it wasn't the sales <br />tax that would drive the people to shop elsewhere but,it.was their own merchandising. People shopped out <br />of Redwood City because they couldn't find the merchandise they wanted here. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.