My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
W1 <br />UI <br />Councilman Herkner stated that he would be for the sales tax provided it was needed and provided the <br />sales tax was adopted from Burlingame South. He spoke about the inevitability of the Council having to set <br />the $1.00 tax limit. He soes not want to see San Mateo or any other northern city getting an advantage <br />over Redwood City and therefore he feels that they should not introduce this ordinance but should introduce <br />the ordinance covering the so-called County wide sales and use tax. Councilman Herkner amended the motion <br />and introduced the so-called County ordinance and adopt ordinance #3 (County wide sales and use tax). The <br />City Attorney stated that the Council could vote on whether or not they wanted to allow Councilman Herkner's <br />amendment. Councilman Herkner's motion lost for lack of a second. Councilman Spillers moved to'amend <br />the motion and offered Mr. Lebsack+s ordinance which was printed in the'Tribune. This motion lost for lack <br />of a second. The original motion carried on roll call with Councilmen Herkner and Spillers voting NO. <br />The Mayor called for a recess at 11:40 P.M. " <br />The meeting was called to order at 11:45'P.M. <br />The City Attorney read the proposed ordiance imposing an excise tax on the storage, use or other consumption <br />of tangible personal property. Councilman Weymouth offered introduction of the use tax on a local basis, <br />seconded by Councilman Weiss. Councilman`Spillers stated that since the Council has stated the things they <br />were going to do that the City Manager is to make a list of priorities and proceed with the list. The <br />motion carried•on roll call with Councilmen Herkner and Spillers voting NO. <br />Councilman Granger offered RESOLUTION 2187 ADOPTING A "USE TAX" RULE and moved its adoption, seconded by <br />Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call with Councilman Spillers'voting NO. <br />The Mayor read the proposed ordinance imposing a uniform sales and use tax. Councilman Stout offered <br />introduction of the ordinance, seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers <br />voting NO. <br />After the reading of the proposed ordinance, Councilman Stout offered introduction of the ordinance of <br />the City providing for the allocation of certain revenues of the City; establishing a maximum tax rate <br />for general municipal purposes: and, providing for submission of a measure of the next general election <br />relative to said matters, seconded by Councilman Weiss and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers voting <br />NO. <br />Councilman Weiss moved that the City Attorney draft and submit for information a resolution whereby the <br />ordinances can be introduced by title provided that each conincilman be given a copy of this ordinance one <br />week before it is adopted by the council. The City Attorney stated that there were times when the Council <br />Additional Police & Fire Dept. Personnel (Recurring) 50,000 <br />Parking Lot d6ficiencies (Possible over next four or five, 20,000 <br />Yacht Harbor (Questionable to my mind - but commited)years 60,000 <br />For a total of $3,130,000 <br />Of course there are many otheritems of a similar nature too numerous to mention, <br />and I here I wihs to note that some of the above items were included in our city managers <br />statement as published in recent issure of the Tribune. Incidentally it must be borne <br />\ <br />in mind that future"annexations will not in any sense lessen the seriousness of our <br />financial situation, on the contrary it will definitely serve to aggravate it. <br />_ <br />It is such'factors that I have weighed, and which have brought me to the conclusion <br />that the sales and use tax is not only a necessity buta must if the small home owner, <br />the backbone of the community, is not to be taxed out of his home, and yet enable us <br />to privide the necessary funds for the continued operation on a sound financial basis in <br />a progressive and orderly manner. <br />It is because of such conclusions that I have decided to hold steadfast in the face <br />of what to some may appear a preponderance of opposition., Because the safeguards that <br />_ <br />I have urged and the equitable allocations as privided in the companion ordinance will <br />uensure <br />that this tax will not be an additional burden, or will it be the'"Slush'Fund" <br />u <br />that was intimated by opponents and repeated in the Tribune; and because it ensures <br />definite property tax reductions that will greatly benefit all of the people; and <br />las&ly because these safeguards are to be submitted to the people for referendum. I <br />have no alternative but to urge favorable action not only on this ordinance but each <br />and every one that bears on this specific topic and as they are to be considered here �. <br />i <br />tonight. <br />Louis Weiss, Councilman <br />UI <br />Councilman Herkner stated that he would be for the sales tax provided it was needed and provided the <br />sales tax was adopted from Burlingame South. He spoke about the inevitability of the Council having to set <br />the $1.00 tax limit. He soes not want to see San Mateo or any other northern city getting an advantage <br />over Redwood City and therefore he feels that they should not introduce this ordinance but should introduce <br />the ordinance covering the so-called County wide sales and use tax. Councilman Herkner amended the motion <br />and introduced the so-called County ordinance and adopt ordinance #3 (County wide sales and use tax). The <br />City Attorney stated that the Council could vote on whether or not they wanted to allow Councilman Herkner's <br />amendment. Councilman Herkner's motion lost for lack of a second. Councilman Spillers moved to'amend <br />the motion and offered Mr. Lebsack+s ordinance which was printed in the'Tribune. This motion lost for lack <br />of a second. The original motion carried on roll call with Councilmen Herkner and Spillers voting NO. <br />The Mayor called for a recess at 11:40 P.M. " <br />The meeting was called to order at 11:45'P.M. <br />The City Attorney read the proposed ordiance imposing an excise tax on the storage, use or other consumption <br />of tangible personal property. Councilman Weymouth offered introduction of the use tax on a local basis, <br />seconded by Councilman Weiss. Councilman`Spillers stated that since the Council has stated the things they <br />were going to do that the City Manager is to make a list of priorities and proceed with the list. The <br />motion carried•on roll call with Councilmen Herkner and Spillers voting NO. <br />Councilman Granger offered RESOLUTION 2187 ADOPTING A "USE TAX" RULE and moved its adoption, seconded by <br />Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call with Councilman Spillers'voting NO. <br />The Mayor read the proposed ordinance imposing a uniform sales and use tax. Councilman Stout offered <br />introduction of the ordinance, seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers <br />voting NO. <br />After the reading of the proposed ordinance, Councilman Stout offered introduction of the ordinance of <br />the City providing for the allocation of certain revenues of the City; establishing a maximum tax rate <br />for general municipal purposes: and, providing for submission of a measure of the next general election <br />relative to said matters, seconded by Councilman Weiss and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers voting <br />NO. <br />Councilman Weiss moved that the City Attorney draft and submit for information a resolution whereby the <br />ordinances can be introduced by title provided that each conincilman be given a copy of this ordinance one <br />week before it is adopted by the council. The City Attorney stated that there were times when the Council <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.