|
Mi
<br />■;
<br />4_86
<br />2. Have we reports and recommendations, in writing, of the various city officials
<br />involved,.especially as to propriety, completeness, etc. of the entire proposal?
<br />If not in writing, is the.City Manager, City Engineer and City Attorney pre-
<br />pared to make necessary report and recommendation verbally at this time, so
<br />that it could be made a part of the minutes of this meeting?
<br />Answer: Records and reports of various city officials indicate proceedings
<br />are in order. City Engineer has signed the plans and specifications. No other
<br />property than Farm Hills will be involved.
<br />3. Can either the City Attorney or the Attorney appointed for this proposed project
<br />advise this Council as to the propriety and legality under the 1911 Act, under
<br />which this assessment district is proposed, to exclude any properties from assess -
<br />q ment and spread the assessment that would normally pertain to such excluded pro-
<br />perty on the remaining properties?
<br />Answer: Both Attorney Lebsack and City Attorney Costello stated that agreements
<br />are approved, all steps that can be taken to protect City have been taken, and the
<br />legal aspect approved by Mr. Lebsack. _
<br />4. Is the property against which these assessments are to be levied a formal sub-
<br />division regularly approved and recorded: If so, hovmany pieces of property LLII
<br />involved.
<br />Answer: Subdivision maps of this property have not as yet been approved or filed.
<br />Councilman Weiss further stated his opinion that he thought the situation sufficiently
<br />urgent to warrant expeditious action, however,,he wanted the records to show he
<br />acquiesced with the understanding this would not establish a precedent in connection
<br />with future development of any subdivision, either for street, water or sanitary
<br />improvements required to be installed by the subdivider at own expense in strict accordance
<br />with subdivision ordinance. Mayor Royer stated that it was the thought of all members of
<br />the Council that these proceedings were not establishing a precedent.
<br />RESOLUTION 225+ APPROVING PLANS, PROFILES, DETAILED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS was offered
<br />by Councilman Spillers, seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call.
<br />RESOLUTION 2255, INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, FARM HILL IMPROVEMENTS
<br />was offered by Councilman Herkner, seconded by Councilman Stout and carried on roll call.
<br />RESOLUTION 2256 FIXING MINIMUM WAGE SCALE, FARM HILL BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS was offered
<br />by Councilman Weymouth, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried on roll call
<br />Councilman Spillers moved adjournment, seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried.
<br />Meeting adjourned, 8:14 p.m.
<br />R. S. DODGE, Itt'Clerk
<br />Minutes of the Regular Meeting
<br />Redwood City Council
<br />June 3, 1957, 8:00 P. M.
<br />Invocation was lead by Reverend Dave Held, First Congregational Church.
<br />ON ROLL CALL the following were noted present: Councilmen Floyd D. Granger, Sidney D. Herkner,
<br />Robert V. Spillers, Hiram S. Stout, Louis Weiss, Mayor William H. Royer and City Clerk
<br />R. S. Dodge. Also present were City Manager E. A. Rolison, City Attorney Robert J.
<br />Costello, City Engineer Glenn M. Jain, Water Superintendent H. L. Winter, Fire Chief J.
<br />L. Lodi, Building Inspector S. H. Kreiss, llanning Commissioner McDonald, Police Chief
<br />William Faulstich, Assessor -Auditor John J. Brophy, and Senior Stenographer Clerk
<br />Vivian Holmquist.
<br />Councilman Spillers moved approval of the minutes of May 20th, 27th and 29th as mailed,
<br />seconded by Councilman Weymouth. Councilman Herkner asked that the minutes of May 27th
<br />
|