My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Traffic Committee recommend that if the Council goes through with this that they accept the plan lines <br />and proceed with acquisition of the property as set by the plan lines. This was followed by discussion <br />of possibly acquiring or having donated a 101 strip and abandoning the rest of the plan lines. Chief <br />Faulstich stated that this would have no effect on the signals, 101 was not engough and the signals <br />would still be left where they are when the three phase signals are installed. Councilman Granger <br />asked that consideration be given to purchasing the 101 strip. After further discussion and with the <br />conset of Mr. Joseph Leonard, Councilman Granger moved to carry this on the agenda for one week in order <br />to give full consideration to the problems presented tonight with the understanding that a final decision <br />will be reached at that meetin, seconded by Councilman Jones. City Engineer Jain stated that the P.G.&E, <br />and the Telephone Comanies will have to be contacted in regard to whether or not they can change their <br />poles to fit the 101 change if that is the. final decision of the Council. Motion carried. <br />After discussion Councilman Royer moved that a letter be written to the State asking them to make their <br />recommendation regarding the three phase •signal in writing by next Monday, seconded by Councilman <br />Granger, Councilman Jones stated that he was not in full agreement with the Traffic signals as opposed <br />to property acquisition. This was followed by discussion after whichthe motion carried. <br />CITY MANAGER REPORT ON BLEACHER COVERING AND SOFTBALL FIELD LIGHTS. The City Manager made an oral report. <br />Unit A, as shown on the plana, was originally estmated at $10,500 for common lumber. For $10,800 the <br />City could get ship -lap siding. <br />Units A and B complete would cost $111,500 with common lumber and with ship -lap $14,900. Councilman <br />Jones raised the question of how much money the City.received from the sale of Hawes Park. $34000 <br />less the price of the Hetch-Hetchy property or approximately $290000 was the amount received. The <br />.lighting will cost approximately $7099 for material only. Estimate for installation was $2,500 or a <br />total cost of lighting $9,600. .Plans and specifications will have to be made, more than likely by an <br />outside firm. <br />To sumorize his report the City Manager stated that the lights would cost about $10,000 and $153,000 for <br />the construction of the bleachers. Councilman Royer stated that the Council originally thought the <br />cost of the lighting would cost $15,000. By compromising on the bleachers and .taking the $10,800 <br />figure and $10,000 for the lights the work can be done for the amount originally figured or $20s000, <br />Unit A will form the wind break. This was followed by discussion in regard to what the money is being <br />spent on. .Councilman Royer moved to accept Unit A and also authorize the installation of the lights, <br />the total job to be approximately $20,000, seconded by Councilman Spillers. City Manager Rolison stated <br />that the City Auditor had placed the money received from the sale of Hawes Park in the Unbudgeted <br />Reserve Account and this money will have to be transferred. Motion carried on roll call with Councilmen <br />Hritschgi and Stout being noted absent. <br />Councilman Granger wanted to know why the money was placed in the Unbudgeted Reserve Account. City <br />Auditor Brophy stated that under the Charter he had to place this money in the General Fund and he put it <br />in the Unbudgeted Reserve until such time as a fund is set up. He also stated that according to <br />Uhlenburg and Company this money can not be set up as a Capital Fund. Councilman Granger offered <br />RESOLUTION 1992 TRANSFERRING $28,650 FROM UNBUDGETED RESERVE AND SETTING UP A FUND (Community Park Fund) <br />and moved its adoptic#, seconded by Councilman Jones. This was followed by discussion as to where the <br />money would be set up and what the fund would be called, also how much money would be transferred. <br />Councilman Granger stated that he did not care where it was set up as long as it was set up as a special <br />fund for recreation facilities. City Attorney Currie suggested that they call it Community Park Fund. <br />The Council agreed to transfer all the money. Motion carried on roll calls Councilmen Britschgi and Jones <br />being noted absent. <br />CHIEF OF POLICE REPORT ON PIN -BALL MACHINES. THE Clerk read the following report: <br />A <br />A <br />L <br />r-� <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.