My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 27_1957-06-17 to 1960-07-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1957 to 1960 Book 27
>
BOOK 27_1957-06-17 to 1960-07-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:40:24 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:36:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/17/1957
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />0 <br />he submit suitable recommendation of dither means of approach to,the problem and as <br />will permit an early and proper determination and action to resolve this question <br />once and for all. Councilman Stout seconded the motion because he stated that <br />there were a couple of questions he would like to have answered. He was of the <br />opinion that the City Attorney should check into this matter and make a report as <br />suggested by Councilman Weiss. <br />The City Attorney stated that this same motion was turned down twice before by the <br />Council and until such time as he is instructed by the Council to make an investi- <br />gation:.; analysis and„report he doesn't feel authorized to take any action in regard <br />to the matter. Councilman Herkner raised the question of what would happen if they <br />found there was anything wrong with the court judgement. The City Attorney stated <br />that he could not determine at this time what action, if any, the City could take <br />without an analysis and review of the matter. This was followed by;,discussion. <br />Councilman Granger stated that he did not believe they should question the judgement <br />of the court especially when this had the approval of the City Attorney at that time <br />and for that reason he was going to vote Nv. This was followed by discussion in <br />regard to the $300,000 indebtedness. City Auditor Brophy stated that there is a <br />chance that there is some change to bemade on the books and if this is done there is <br />a good chance the indebtedness will be charged off within the next ten years. The <br />motion lost on roll call with Councilmen Granger, Herkner, Spillers, Weymouth and <br />Mayor Royer voting No and Councilmen Stout and Weiss voting Yes. <br />REPORT ON INTEREST RATES, 90 DAY TIME DEPOSIT. The City Treasurer stated that he con- <br />tacted the banks as requested by the Council at the previous council meeting. He <br />received letters from all five banks and they all bid the same interest rate. Coun- <br />cilman Granger asked if Wells Fargo.was going to ask for another portion of the money <br />since they are now going to have two banks in Redwood City the same as the Bank of <br />America. The Clerk read the letter from P. N. Jubchenko, Manager of the Bank of <br />America on Broadway at Jefferson Avenue. Mr. Lubchenko asked the Council in con- <br />sidering the proportionate amounts to be deposited in each bank to give consideration <br />to the following factors: <br />In times when the city had surplus funds, their bank always was willing to pay <br />interest on inactive accounts. In addition, they have always provided market for <br />bonds whenever the city required money for improvements of whatever nature. In con- <br />sidering the allocation of inactive funds, thought should be given to placing these <br />funds in banks that are not only interested in a depositary relationship, but that <br />consistently welcome the borrowings as well. <br />They have always invited the City to use services of their Bond Department, results <br />of which have provided savings to the taxpayers. They would apZr eciate it if the <br />deposits placed in their bank at the present time would remain intact. <br />Councilman Stout was of the opinion that the money should be divided between the banks <br />and not between the branches of the banks. Councilman Spillers wanted to know why the <br />needed to change the system they are now following. The Mayor stated that the other <br />banks asked for a chance for some City money. He stated that when times were bad the <br />two banks that are handling the money now were the only ones who Would give the City <br />any consideration. This was followed by discussion. Councilman Stout was of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.