My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-02-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-02-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2005 11:57:23 AM
Creation date
2/3/2005 4:36:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/7/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /><6-14 - to <br /> <br />CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION FILES AMICUS BRIEF <br /> <br />IN CASE BEFORE U.S. SUPREME COURT <br /> <br />The California Redevelopment Association reaffirm its prior case law holding that blight is <br />(CRA) has filed a "friend of the court" brief in Kela v. determined on an area basis, not parcel by parcel. <br />City of New London (Connecticut) a case before <br />the United States Supreme Court. In the next few <br />months, the Court will review the case and deter- <br />mine whether "public use" includes the ability to <br />condemn private, non-blighted property for eco- <br />nomic development - a decision that may have far- <br />reaching consequences for local governments and <br />redevelopment agencies, including those in Califor- <br />nia. <br /> <br />The development project at issue in Kelo <br />involves approximately 90 acres encompassing <br />development of an upscale hotel and conference <br />center, new residences, and upgrades to the state <br />park and wastewater treatment plant. The city <br />anticipates that the project will create over 1 ,000 <br />jobs and significantly increase tax and other rev- <br />enues for the city. The petitioners are seven prop- <br />erty owners who own 15 homes in the development <br />plan area. Challenging the city's right to take their <br />property, they argue that this does not satisfy the <br />public use requirement of the state and federal <br />constitutions. <br /> <br />In Kela, a divided Connecticut Supreme Court <br />held that, under the Connecticut and United States <br />Constitutions, eminent domain might be used to <br />acquire private, non-blighted property for economic <br />development purposes such as job creation and <br />increasing municipal revenues. The petitioners <br />urge the United States Supreme Court to overtum <br />Kela. They argue that economic development by <br />itself should never meet the public use requirement <br />of the First Amendment. They further ask that if the <br />court finds that economic development is a public <br />use, the court require the agency to prove with a <br />reasonable certainty that the project will in fact <br />result in the anticipated benefits. <br /> <br />While the case does not challenge the use of <br />eminent domain to eliminate blight, a loosely <br />worded opinion could affect redevelopment in <br />California by making it more difficult to acquire non- <br />blighted property in a redevelopment project area. <br />For this reason, CRA is submitting an amicus curiae <br />(or "friend of the court") brief in support of the City <br />of New London urging the Supreme Court to find <br />that economic development is a public use and <br /> <br />It is anticipated that the Supreme Court will <br />hear oral arguments of the Kela case in late <br />February, and the case should be decided by <br />summer of 2005. <br /> <br />Brent Hawkins and Amber Hyman both of , <br />McDonough, Holland & Allen have written an article <br />on this case to appear in an upcoming issue of the <br />Redevelopment Journal, which will be posted on <br />the CRA Website, www.calredevelop.org. You can <br />also find more infonnation about the case at the <br />National League of Cities Website: www.nlc.org/ <br /> <br />A NEW LOOK FOR PRIORITY FOCUS <br /> <br />Just in the time for the new legislative session, <br />Priority Focus this week is displaying a brand new <br />look. <br /> <br />"We wanted a stronger visual impact," said <br />Megan Taylor, the League's Director of Communi- <br />cations. "Our members are very busy people. The <br />purpose of this weekly newsletter is to draw our <br />members' attention to issues or concerns that <br />impact most or all California cities. Our previous <br />masthead just didn't convey the priority nature of <br />these issues: <br /> <br />Priority Focus is delivered weekly to more than <br />3,900 subscribers, an increase over the past 4 <br />years of at about 50%. <br /> <br />"In the past most people received the newsletter <br />in a printed version, delivered through 'snailmail'" , <br />said Taylor. "Moving to an electronic version has <br />saved the League thousands of dollars in postage, <br />and put the publication in our members' mailboxes <br />much more quickly." <br /> <br />Taylor added that these types of innovations <br />are part of an ongoing effort on the part of the <br />League to improve upon the delivery of important <br />information to and from League members. <br /> <br />PAGE 2/PRIORITV FOCUS <br /> <br />Visit the League's Off"lCial Web Site--www.cacities.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.