My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-05-20
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-05-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:09 PM
Creation date
5/17/2002 8:53:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/20/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br />SB 1521 (Kuehl). Land Use. Model Planning help save the lives of persons hit with sudden cardiac <br />Practices and Policies. As amended on May 6, SB arrest. While many cities want to install these ma- <br />1521 requires the Director of the Office of Planning chines in city buildings, they are reluctant to do so <br />and Research (OPR), or his or her designee, and OPt~'s because of potential liability exposure. Private <br />Planning and Advisory Council, to develop and periodi- building owners face the same dilemma. AB 2041, <br />call}~ review model planning practices and policies that sponsored by the City of San Diego and supported by <br />emphasize land uses that are economically, socially, a wide coalition of groups, would address the liability <br />and environmentally sustainable and that promote issue and thus encourage installation of these ma- <br />specified concepts, and to make the model practices chines. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: AsmFIr' Posi- <br />and policies available to cities, counties, and cities and tion: Support. <br />counties by January 1, 2004. The bill also states that <br />any city, county, or city and county that adopts and ENVIRONMENTAL <br />implements substantially comparable practices and <br />policies would receive priority eligibility in the award SB 1542 (Escutia). Solid Waste Facilities. <br />of competitive grants, as defined, for infrastructure, Environmental Justice. As amended, SB 1542 no <br />commercial or industrial development, or other longer authorizes the California Integrated Waste <br />economic development. Management Board to concur or object (i.e., disap- <br /> prove) a solid waste facility permit based on environ- <br />The League had taken an oppose position on mental,justice criteria. Rather, the bill now directs the <br />earlier versions of this bill, which preempted local Waste Board to develop guidelines for use by local <br />land use authority, and appeared to establish a quasi- agencies to consider environmental_justice issues <br />housing element process where other local land use relative to solid waste facilities and requires the local <br />issues would be subject to state review on a five-year Countywide Siting Element to include consideration of <br />cycle. The amendments taken on May 6 have ad- environmental_justice issues. <br />dressed a number of our initial concerns, and have <br />caused the League to change its position on SB 1521 While these amer~cments respond to the League's <br />to Support, if Amended. League staff is working with direct concern that the bill ultimately authorizes the <br />the sponsors of this bill to eliminate the remaining Board to ob_ject to a permit based on environmental <br />concerns. The bottom line is that while it may be justice grounds, the League still opposes SB 1542. It <br />helpful to cities to be recognized in their efforts to is certainly better to consider environmental_justice <br />promote various "smart growth" practices and poll- issues earlier in the process and at the local level, <br />cies, the program must be framed as an award pro- which SB 1542 now provides. Under existing law, a <br />gram, not as a future leverage point to expand state proposed new or expanded solid waste facility must <br />involvement in local land use decisions. Cities are be included in a locally adopted and Waste Board <br />encouraged to review the bill in its current form and approved Countywide Siting Element. However, as SB <br />let the League know if you have any concerns. Staff: 1542 is currently written, the League continues to be <br />Daniel Carrigg, Status: SenHou&gomDev, Position: concerned that the Waste Board could still overrule <br />Support, if Amended. local decisions because it does not like how a local <br /> agency "considered" environmental `justice in the <br /> siting element. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: <br />ADMINISTRATIVE SenApps, Position: Oppose. <br />AB 2041 (Vargas). Liability. Automated <br />External Defibrillators. AB 2041 grants limited PUBLIC SAFETY <br />immunity under California's Good Samaritan Law for <br />persons and facility owners who use or install Auto- AB 2211 (Horton). Criminal Procedure. AB <br />mated External Defibrillators (AEDs). These "fail safe" 2211 is a logical extension of community-oriented <br />computerized life-saving machines can be used to policing, that may actually expand awareness of the <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.