My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-05-20
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-05-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:09 PM
Creation date
5/17/2002 8:53:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/20/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
May 9, 2002 <br /> <br /> City Council Member~ <br /> City of Redwood City <br /> 1017 Middlefield Rood <br /> Redwood City, CA 94063 <br /> <br /> RE: Appeal of Planning Commission and Zoning Hearing Officer Approvals of <br /> Proposed Residence @747 Southview Way, Redwood City for Christy Brown <br /> and Ayoub Farahyar <br /> <br /> Ladies and Gentlemen: <br /> <br /> Herring & Worley, Inc. are the architects for the above-captioned project, We wdte to <br /> urge you to deny the appeal filed by Dale Koop. In connection with the project itself, <br /> the review processes which led to project approvals and issues raised in Mr. Koop's <br /> appeal, we ask that you note: <br /> <br /> Reaardina Protect Ar~Drovqt~; <br /> <br /> Project approval by the Redwood City Zoning Headng Officer was given after a <br /> public headng which followed Planning Commission public hearings of this proposal <br /> which resulted in the Commission's unanimous approval of motions to recommend <br /> that the Zoning Hearing Officer approve the project. All these hearings were properly <br /> noticed and Planning Commission hearings were well attended by potentially <br /> impacted neighbor~. The Planning Commission's conclusions regarding this project <br /> were entirely affirmative. Commission commentary regarding the building design was <br /> uniformly positive. The Zoning Hearing Officer's hearing was conducted in a standard <br /> and appropriate manner. Mr, Koop's description of the review process at that <br /> headng as "simply a rubber stamp" was not only discourteous, it was incorrect, <br /> <br /> Reaardinq "reauirement¢' by other municipalities and the orovision of improvements to <br /> benefit propedies Outside Redwood City boundaries: - <br /> <br />Mr. Koop's appeal dwells on what he mistakenly believes ore "requirements" made by <br />the neighboring municipality (in which he residesJ. In fact, Mr. Farahyar's lands (and his <br />present residence) are in Redwood Cif¢ not Woodside, Although Herring & Wodey. Inc, <br />once feared water service for the 747 $oufhview property Ilar both fire support and <br />domestic use) might need to come from a main tine within the jurisdiction of the Town of <br />WoodsJde our fears proved groundless. Water and sewer services for this residence will <br />be provided from mains within Redwood City. This happy circumstance (which c:losect <br />the door on demands ["requirements"] from the neighboring municipality) does not <br />mean that Mr. Farahyar has turned his back on Woodside (or ,San Mateo County) <br />residents along $oufhview Way. The approved proposal includes the provision of a <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.