Laserfiche WebLink
Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br />that contains an electric generation facility, the already provides counties with the ability to block <br />county in which that city is located shall continue to annexations when they are unsatisfied with a pro- <br />receive the revenues derived from franchises and posed tax agreement. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: <br />surcharges that the county received prior to that AsLC;;Hrg-5/8, Position: Oppose. <br />annexation. This bill also states the intent of the <br />Legislature that these provisions supersede any ENVIRONMENTAL <br />provision of law that is contrary to these provisions. <br /> SB 1374 (Kuehl). Solid Waste. Diversion of <br />AB 2073 is sponsored by Contra Costa County, sup- <br />posedly out of concerns with the location of genera- Construction and Demolition Waste. As recently <br />tots adjacent to Antioch and Pittsburgh. However, the amended, SB 1374 requires the California Integrated <br />bill has statewide applicability, Waste Management Board (Waste Board) to develop <br /> model local ordinances designed to stimulate the <br />The League opposes AB 2073 because it attempts diversion of construction and demolition (C&D) waste <br />to dictate the terms of revenue agreement associated from disposal. It also requires the Waste Board to <br />with an annexation in favor of counties, to the clear provide information on other ways local governments <br />detriment of cities, Counties already possess veto could encourage C&D waste diversion, as well as <br />power over any annexation proposal before the information for the construction industry. Respond- <br />proposal even gets to LAFCO, due to the requirements ins to the concerns expressed by the League and <br />of section 99(b)(6) of the Revenue and Taxation others, this bill no longer requires cities and counties <br />Code, Counties can already quash an annexation to adopt a C&D waste ordinance. Instead the bill now <br />discussion by simply refusing to approve a property requires local agencies to include information about <br />tax agreement. Counties have not been reluctant to their C&D programs in their annual AB 939 report to <br />use this leverage in the past by insisting that they the Waste Board and authorizes the Waste Board to <br />receive most or all property taxes associated with an consider what the jurisdiction is doing to address C&D <br />annexation, or to attempt to force agreemen~ on waste when the Board determines whether thejuris- <br />sales taxes and other revenues and concessions from diction is making a good faith effort to achieve its AB <br />the affected city, 939 goals. With these amendments, the League now <br /> supports SB 1374. The League is working with the <br />Cities are concerned that existing law is already author's office on additional technical amendments, <br />tilted in favor of the counties, and that cities often Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: SenApps, Position: <br />end up with tax agreements that fail to fully cover the Support. <br />service needs associated with housing and other uses <br />approved on the annexed property. AB 230(I (Chavez). Inert Wastes. Mine Recla- <br /> marion Sites. AB 939 Credit. As proposed to be <br />Additionally, AB 2073 may provide an incentive amended soon, AB 2308 clarifies that inert wastes <br />for counties to use their land use authority to site such as concrete, asphalt or other debris that meets <br />power generation facilities adjacent to cities, and let specific criteria that is deposited at a mine reclama- <br />the city and its residents deal with the negative health tion site is not considered disposal for the purposes <br />and environmental issues, while the county is contin- of measuring progress towards AB 939. The bill <br />ues to pocket the revenues. The League believes that responds to the dilemma facing cities in Southern <br />it is inappropriate to favor counties over cities in California who have seen their AB 939 numbers, <br />annexation discussions in this manner. This is a local Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: AsNatRes, Position: <br />issue which should continue to be negotiated by the Support. <br />affected parties, especially given that existing law <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 7 <br /> <br /> <br />