My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-06-03
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-06-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:12 PM
Creation date
5/31/2002 9:02:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/3/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Legislative Bill Action <br /> The following are summaries of just a few of the legislative bills that are currently being acted upon by the <br /> League of California Cities. The League encourages you to review the bills on its Web site at www, cacities, org/ <br /> legtracking and contact the appropriate committees to demonstrate your support or opposition of issues. <br /> Your assistance is appreciated, <br /> <br />TP, ANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS ment. Transportation. Congestion Management <br />AB 1800 (Kehoe). Motor Vehicles. Persons Programs. SB 1636, amended May 13, requires <br /> cities and counties to include streets and highways <br />With Disabilities. AB 1800 authorizes, until <br /> within an infill opportunity zone in an alternative <br />January 1, 2006, a disabled person or disabled <br /> area wide level of service standard or multi-modal <br />veteran, displaying special disabled person license <br />plates or a placard, to park in restricted zones composite or personal level of service standard, <br />designated for street sweeping, without being that takes into account: 1) the broader benefits of <br />issued a parking violation. AB 1800 runs counter regional traffic congestion reduction by siting new <br /> residential development within walking distance of, <br />to the requirements being put in place by the state and no more than one-third mile from, mass transit <br />and regional water quality control boards relative <br /> stations, shops, and services, in a manner that <br />to NPDES and TMDL permits. Although AB 1800 <br /> reduces the need for long vehicle commutes and <br />was recently amended to include intent language to improves the.job-housing balance; and 2) increased <br />address the concern of local governments regarding <br />potential violations of a municipal storm water use of alternative transportation modes, such as <br /> mass transit, bicycling, and walking. The May 13 <br />permit, it does not address our very real concerns <br />about its impacts on TMDL standards imposed by amendment also requires the city or county in <br />regional boards on local governments or other which the infill opportunity zone is located, to <br />water quality standards. We have suggested addi- ensure that the qualifying infill development <br />tional language (underlined below) to address our project is completed within four years of the start <br />TMDL and water quality issue concerns: of the pro~ect, For the purposes of updating <br /> congestion management programs, SB 1636 defines <br /> an infill opportunity zone as an area designated by <br /> SEC. 5. It is the intent of the Legislature <br />that compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision a city or county as a target for new compact <br /> residential, retail, or commercial development <br />(a) of Section 22511.5, as amended, shall not be <br />construed to create a violation of any municipal within one-third mile of specified transportation <br /> sites in counties with a population of over <br />storm water National Pollutant Discharge Elimina- <br />tion System permit, or of any total maximum daily 400,000. San Jose supports SB 1636 as amended. <br />load or water quality standard or objective. The The League would like to hear what your city <br /> - thinks. Please contact League staff and let us <br />Legislature intends to reassess the provisions of <br /> know how this bill would affect your city. Staff: <br />paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section <br /> Natasha Fooman, Status: SenLG, Position: Review <br />22511.5, as amended, after obtaining information and Comment. <br />from the League of California Cities on any impact <br />this measure may have on the ability of local <br />agencies to obtain or remain in compliance with ENVIRONMENTAL <br />municipal storm water permits. AB 2351 (Canciamilla). Water Ouality. <br /> Mandatory Minimum Penalties. AB 2351 co- <br />Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: SenTrans;Hrg- sponsored by the League and the California Associa- <br />6/4, Position: Oppose Unless Amended. tion of Sanitation Agencies, makes important <br />S8 1636 (Figueroa). Congestio~ Manage- changes to existing law that requires regional water <br /> <br />PAGE lO/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. cacities.org <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.