Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No.1 (continued) <br /> <br />Mr. Grunwald then gave a slide presentation, beginning with a drawing of the <br />total redevelopment area of the City, which is comprised of four separate <br />areas, and which collectively share in the tax increment funds generated by <br />their being declared a redevelopment area. Referring to slides of the Centre <br />Area, he commented on the access points, the zoning and the significant <br />features of some of the land uses. Referring to a slide showing an analysis <br />of Assessor's records, he stated that this was for the purpose of looking at <br />improvements to land value ratio in order to determine what the relation of <br />improvements to land value is, and that irrespective of appraised value, when <br />the ratio of improvements or buildings on the land is less than 1, that is a <br />good indicator that the use is subject to redevelopment. He describd the <br />various sources and kinds of data accumulated for the study, including the <br />County's geological maps and historical records to locate the Red\Þ,()od Creek <br />bed; noise studies done as it would affect residential development; a real <br />estate study showing a strong demand for affordab le housing, and a potentia 1 <br />for retail market demand; and commissioned a firm specializing in <br />redevelopment financing and fiscal analysis to analyze the current financial <br />capacity of the redevelopment agency to undertake revitalization. He said <br />that most of the tax increment that has been projected in the project area is <br />already committed to projects already entered into by the Agency, hence any <br />further tax increment income would have to come from new development to <br />support redevelopment. He also stated that the larger parcels are the <br />opportunity sites, and are predominantly city-owned land. One of the major <br />planning issues was to coordinate with the Civic Center program; another issue <br />was the competition for funds with other projects in the redevelopment areas. <br />He referred to slides of artist's concepts of proposals for the area of the <br />civic center, depicting residential development over retail stores, separated <br />from city hall by a water feature in the area of Redwood Creek, which <br />presently runs under the parking lot. <br /> <br />Discussion followed, and Mr. Grunwald replied to questions and commented <br />regard ing antic ipated park ing requirements, proposa ls for park ing structures; <br />the existing excess inventory of office space, which he estimated would take <br />about five years to absorb; that possibly it is not necessary to replace <br />parking spaces equivalent to what currently exists; that the suggested water <br />feature could be accomplished either by opening up Redwood Creek, or by <br />building a surface water feature next to the storm drain. <br /> <br />Mr. Grunwald also recommended with regard to parking that since land costs in <br />the area are $20 per square foot, a parking structure would be more economical <br />use of the land. He ind icated in response to quest ion th at revenue wou ld be <br />generated from net sale proceeds for the property and tax increment income. <br /> <br />Mr. Grunwald noted that this presentation was not the final proposal; that he <br />anticipated they will bring back a final report in about six week. He advised <br />in response to request that he will provide copies of the slides and an <br />accompanying report to Council in the near future. <br /> <br />The Director commended Mr. Grunwald for the excellent presentation. <br /> <br />---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />Redev.Agency.Mtg. <br />4/29/85 <br />P ag e 2 <br /> <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 45 <br />Page No. 454 <br />