My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
RDA Min 2002-05-06
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Redevelopment
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
RDA Min 2002-05-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:39:58 PM
Creation date
6/3/2002 8:26:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Agency Type
Redevelopment
Date
5/6/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning & Development Director Chumh stated this item to be a minor correction <br /> to an action taken in March. At that time approval was given to commence an <br /> owner participation process in the South Main Street Area. At that time it was <br /> suggested that the process be broken down into two phases and that both phases <br /> be treated at the same time by anybody responding. Due to the concern from <br /> some of the owners in the area and what it may mean to their businesses and <br /> property, as an amendment to that, it is suggested to move forward with only the <br /> first phase. Phase I is predominately the sites occupied by Towne Ford. No action <br /> on Phase II would be taken unless or until something comes back to the Agency <br /> Board at a subsequent meeting. <br /> <br /> City Manager Everett stated there was clear interest in the area to get involved <br /> and a Contract Planner would work with the stakeholders to work through what <br /> they would like the area to look like. <br /> <br /> Public Comment: <br /> Robert Baldwin, a business owner, asked if Phase I is to include some housing <br /> and if so, he felt it would have a significant effect on the owners and businesses in <br /> the Phase II area. He stated that as a group there is a better chance to negotiate <br /> a deal with the City and the developers as a united effort with the Phase I group. <br /> He recommended the Board shelve the entire agenda until the involved and <br /> interested parties have had a chance to get on the same page. <br /> <br /> The Board requested clarification on comments made regarding lack of <br /> communication and Board discussion occurred on the planning process of Phase I <br /> and Phase I1. <br /> <br /> City Manager Everett stated the purpose of the bifurcation to be a way to allow <br /> enough time for the stakeholders to study the issue of housing in Phase I1. <br /> <br /> Planning and Redevelopment Director Church stated Mr. Baldwin may be helpful <br /> as a collection point person for dissemination of information in the neighborhood. <br /> An individual mailout to those on record as owning or renting in the area would <br /> also occur. <br /> <br /> M/S Ruskin/Howard to accept the staff recommendation as follows: <br /> <br /> 1) That the March 25, 2002 staff report still be regarded as the "plan" document <br /> for this entire area but with the following changes: <br /> 2) That the Board direct staff to only begin the Owner Participation process within <br /> the Phase I area bounded by Maple Street, Lathrop Street and El Camino Real <br /> and that proposals only respond to the Phase I area; <br /> 3) That the Board clarifies that any action with regard to Phase II (the area <br /> generally bounded by Maple Street, the railroad tracks, Chestnut Street, and <br /> <br />REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING May 6, 2002 <br />MINUTES PAGE 2 <br /> MINUTES BOOK NO. 2 <br /> Page No. 102 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.