Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) <br />Item No. 2 (continued) <br />Mayor Stangel declared the public hearing open at 7:45 p.m. <br />Affidavits of Publication of Notice of Hearing and of Mailing are on <br />file. <br />Dr. Rodger F. Whitney, 2019 Poplar, an appellant, referred to the appeal <br />letters containing his objections to the granting of the subject variance <br />and urged that the appeal be upheld and the property owner be denied the <br />variance. <br />William G. Phoenix, petitioner for Berla Ellis for the variance as buyer <br />of the subject property, stated that his purchase of the property was not <br />dependent upon obtaining the variance, but that he wished to build a <br />second dwelling on the large lot, noting that it is more than twice as <br />large as many on Poplar Street, but lacks street frontage in the back <br />where the lot line is on a drainage ditch. Mr. Phoenix presented written <br />statements from Michael D. White, Jesse 0. Parks, Don J. Cardoza and <br />Cynthia Worcester, all owner - residents of adjacent or nearby property, <br />requesting that their names be withdrawn from the appeal petition. Mr. <br />Phoenix reported that they no longer object to the issuance of the <br />variance. Mr. Phoenix stated that the lots adjacent to his were once one <br />lot of the same size (13,900 sq. ft.) and was split into the present two <br />lots (6,200 and 7,700 sq. ft. each) of approximately the same sizes he has <br />requested. He said that the smaller adjacent lot has only 18 ft. of <br />frontage on Fairview Street, the rest being on the ditch, and that it is <br />occupied by a Redwood City police officer. <br />Mr. Phoenix continued, commenting on the appearance of homes in the <br />neighborhood, some old cars on the street, fears of tenant - occupancy of <br />the properties, fears regarding possible incursion of multiple - dwelling <br />zoning into the neighborhood, and replied to questions concerning the <br />existing house and alterations which might have to be made to accommodate <br />a rear house and driveway and experience with "flag" lots. Mr. Phoenix <br />urged the appeal be denied. <br />Ted Cole, retired Police Officer, Fairview Avenue, identified himself as <br />the owner - occupant of the lot with 18 foot frontage adjacent to the <br />subject property and objected to any suggestion that his subdivided lot <br />might represent a special circumstance. Mr. Cole said that his frontage <br />is adequate and noted the presence of redwood and other trees on the <br />subject property. <br />Steve Beroldo, 2010 Poplar, an appellant, suggested the large lot is <br />saleable now and would be desirable for a large family. <br />Mr. Phoenix (see above) stated for the record that he apologizes to Mr. <br />Cole and did not mean to suggest any impropriety. <br />Lou Maseri, 1237 Truman, suggested that it would not be possible to get <br />fire equipment or other emergency vehicles into the proposed rear lot. <br />At the request of City Attorney Schricker, Fire Chief O'Brien stated for <br />the record that many such driveways exist in Redwood City and no attempt <br />is made to drive emergency equipment on them, and that whenever necessary, <br />hose is carried. Chief O'Brien stated that the subject property offers no <br />unusual problems which would prevent emergency equipment from reaching <br />it. <br />Reg.Mtg. <br />1/3/83 <br />Page 2 <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 44 <br />Page No. 32 <br />