My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-06-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-06-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:15 PM
Creation date
6/7/2002 9:48:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/10/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Senate Bud'ge{ and Fiscal Review Committee <br />version approved the Subcommittee recommenda- Budget Updates On League Web site <br />tions with changes that result in $1 billion more Want to know what's going on with the state <br />expenditures than are contained in the Governor's budget? Check the League's "Budget Update" on <br />May Revision ($379M in additional program expen- our Web site at (cacities.org/budgetupdate), or <br />ditures, combined with a $600M accounting error by clicking on "State Budget Alert" in the Prior- <br />made in the May revision), The higher appropria- ity issues section on the Web site's Home Page, <br />tions are directed primarily to the health and welfare AS the Budget Conference Committee or other <br />programs that took a heavy hit in the May Revision, legislative action occurs on budget issues of <br />and should be seen as reflecting the Senate's "bot- <br /> interest to cities, we will provide updates (noted <br />tom line". If the Senate holds to this higher appro- <br />priation level, the Conference Committee must make by their date) -- so be sure to check back <br />$1 billion in cuts elsewhere or increase revenues to regularly. If you have any specific questions or <br />balance the budget, creating pressures on other concerns about the budget, contact Jean Korinke <br />areas of the budget. (jkorinke@cacities.org; 916-658-8245). <br /> <br />The possibility of additional budget cuts came <br />up again at week's end, when Republicans in both . t,L£S TAX from page 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · <br />houses refused to provide the two-thirds votes <br />needed to pass the budget bill to Conference. The The amendment was approved over the objection <br />Assembly Democratic majority adopted procedural of the League, individual cities, and CSAC, As <br />amendments to the bills in order to pass their approved, the amended regulation would provide <br />budget bill on a simple majority vote. In the Senate, that 50 percent of the lump-sum charge for an <br />however, the bill was passed with two Republican optional software maintenance agreement is for the <br />votes -- but only after a Republican amendment was sale of tangible personal property and subject to tax <br />taken to include Control Language specifying that an with the remaining 50 percent identified as nontax- <br />additional $4.5 billion in cuts would be taken in the able charges for repair, Under current provisions of <br />Budget Conference Committee. This amendment will Regulation 1502, the entire lump-sum charge for an <br />constitute yet another conference item. While it is optional software maintenance agreement is subject <br />unlikely that the Committee will adopt this approach, to tax, <br />including it on the conference agenda is bound to The Board of Equalization staff analysis projects <br />generate intense discussion during the Committee that the changes would cost local governments <br />deliberations, between $5 - 8 million annually. As originally <br /> proposed, the amendments would also have been <br />Conference Committee is expected to start early retroactive allowing for refund requests to be <br />next week. The Committee membership is be: submitted for sales taxes incurred up to 3 years ago, <br />Assembly: Jenny Oropeza (D-Long Beach), Darrell The League contended that the retroactive nature <br />Steinberg (D-Sacramento) and John Campbell (R- would have a significant impact on city revenues, <br />Orange County/Irvine). Senate: Steve Peace (D-San and asked for it to be a prospective ruling. The BOE <br />Diego/El Cajon), Dick Ackerman (R-Orange County/ accepted our proposal resulting in the January 1, <br />Irvine) and or Wes Chesbro (D-North Coast/Arcata). 2003 effectwe date being applied. <br /> <br /> Our Mission <br /> Restore and prorect local control for citie.~ through education and advocacy to enhance the qu~liry of life for all Californians. <br /> <br />PAGE 2/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web $ite--www. cacities.org <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.