My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt05 DES Architects Engineers
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agmt05 Under $60K
>
Agmt05 DES Architects Engineers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2008 9:18:57 AM
Creation date
3/30/2005 7:47:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
DES Architects Engineers
PROJECT NAME
structural design review services
RMP File Number
304.5
Date
3/29/2005
Box
6586
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />i"""R.!0.2005 <br /> <br />3:06PM <br /> <br />D.E.S. ARCHITECTS <br /> <br />NO.2!! <br /> <br />P.4/4 <br /> <br />EXHIBIT "A" <br /> <br />Steve Mincey <br /> <br />- --- _oL- <br /> <br />-,., <br /> <br />'-- <br /> <br />From; <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Ce; <br />SLJbject: <br /> <br />Steve Mincey <br />Friday, December 10, 20043:42 PM <br />miohael@lakestreetventl.lres.colT¡ <br />Igor Kharitonoff; 'Ian Ross' <br />AQded Services for Theater Way <br /> <br />Michael, <br /> <br />Based on the conversatIon this morning we see the following occurring. <br /> <br />1a) DES reviewed basic gravity weights for conformance to assumptions and provide color mark-up (dol1e).(8 hrs) <br />1b) DES will review basic shear and moment forces for conformance to assumptions and general impact on slab,(6 I,rs) <br />1c) Discussion and formal feedback regarding above (inc!. today). (3 hrs) . <br /> <br />2a) Discussion with structura) on preferred method of connection to slab (general confIguration will be subject to <br />waterproofing review by others).(1 hr) <br />2b) Review and comment on specific prellmlnary details proposed by structural for anchorage. (1 hr/detail, assume 2 <br />light posts, 2 planters, 2 big bowl planter. 6 hrs total) <br />2c) Review of specific details proposed by civil to verify thIckness and weight is not excessive (1 hr/detail. assume 4 <br />details, 4hrs total) <br /> <br />3a) Review of 75% set of drawings for conformance to prevIous dIscussions. (2 hrs) <br />3b) Review of where each detail occurs In relation to other items below (all typical conditions or are there some custom <br />problems?) (2 hrs) <br /> <br />4a) DES to develop details of modifications to the structural slab. (Only the portion that will need to be constructed with <br />slab allowing future connectIon by others) (8 hrs engineering, 12 hrs draHing) <br />4b) Send to City and Structural for review (no time) <br />4c) Issue as supplemental instruction to Garage Architect. (2 hrs engineering) <br /> <br />Sa) Plan check issues? (unknown) <br />5b) Coordination in field? (unknown) <br /> <br />In addition to the above there will be 8 hrs of Admin and 4 hrs of principal time. <br /> <br />Total 66 hrs at $105 average rate", $6,930. <br />Ian: Please let me know if these steps are dIfferent from what you extracted from this morning's conversatíor), <br /> <br />Michael, I will await your direction. <br /> <br />STEPHEN D. MINCEY, P.E. <br /> <br />.:,:'f.:o, ;':'rii~I~J¡'.':j:; <br /> <br />DES Architects + Engineers <br />,:;f,1\;¡ i:)I",,'jind !;:~?,.:..'¡ <br /> <br />r-~'I¡j'N::'I:,,':i City C,,~ :;".::,::;',:) <br />l' (:6(:,:;'1$.;.1. \';"'!:«.; U,~, ~:,.:;:: <br />¡,;:: ':;1:<1. :'::::;4,:8;.J ~ì <br /> <br />.!in'!¡¡K'~:':I\::i';:Ul:.,::~,,~.,;):(: <br />)lII).'lWL d!it$ -~"'!2.Q.ffi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.