My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1982-01-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
CC Min 1982-01-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2005 10:59:29 AM
Creation date
3/30/2005 2:37:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Date
1/25/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />..".........~._.. <br /> <br />. _. ... -..........--....... '" "- ....-.... <br /> <br />III==::t <br /> <br />AGENDA (continued) <br /> <br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> <br />1. Oral reports of Council representatives to <br />the Community Development and Revenue and <br />Taxation Committees of the League of <br />California Cities <br /> <br />--"'~""'-"-"'-"""""""""-"-'-'" ,..........-.-.... <br /> <br />ACTION TAKEN (continued) <br /> <br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> <br />Councilman Britschgi, member of the Revenue <br />and Taxation Committee, reported that the <br />Governor's proposed budget has been given to <br />the Legislature and that the Committee took <br />the same stands as those taken in 1981. <br />Councilman Britschgi observed that the <br />prospects for funds for cities look bleak <br />and noted that the Governor included a <br />proposed increase in the number of State <br />employees in his budget. <br /> <br />(See report of Councilman Bury, member of <br />the Community Development Committee, below <br />page 5. ... -- ....-., <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />REPORTS OF CITY MANAGER <br /> <br />2. Refuse Collection Alternatives <br />(oontinued from 1/18/82, 12/21 and 12/7181; <br />Report of City Manager 12/3/81 and Reports <br />of Director of Finanoe 1/13/82 and 12/2/81 <br /> <br />rr--- <br /> <br />REPORTS OF CITY MANAGER <br /> <br />Assistant City Manager Smith reported that no <br />decision has been made by the Bay <br />Conservation and Development Commission <br />(BCDC) relating to extending the use of the <br />Menlo Park dump site beyond .th.,aon.duled <br />February 1, 1982 closing date and recommended <br />delaying consideration of the matter until <br />BCDC aots. <br /> <br />M/S: Rhodes/Leipzig to continue the item <br />relating to Refuse Collection Alternatives to <br />February " 1982. <br />Carried unanimously by voice vote. <br />(MINUTE ORDER NO. 82-10) <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />3. Emerald Hill Road Engineering and Traffic <br />Survey <br /> <br />...~ <br /> <br />~o <br />rp <br /> <br />. " <br /> <br />". t,:' <br />. <br /> <br />Report of City Manager 1/21/82 <br />Report of Direotor of Public Works 1/14/82 <br /> <br />(Councilman Bury arrived at 7:45 p.m.) <br /> <br />Traffic Engineer Gee desor1bed the four-part <br />sign planned to be used on Emerald Hill Road, <br />acknowledging that only the speed limit is <br />usually posted, but stating that the <br />addi tional slgns"are.recolDlllended because-...." <br />residents suggested they might alleviate some <br />of their concern for children crossing the <br />street. <br /> <br />Discussion followed and Mr.. Gee commented and <br />replied to questions relating to State <br />requirements for radar enforcement of speed <br />limits on FAU and Select Street System <br />streets; whether the four signs might not be <br />confusing; the fact-that school ohildren'-may <br />be in the area but not within the State <br />distance from a school for the 25 mph zone; <br /> <br />Reg.Mtg. <br />1/25/82 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.