My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-04-11
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-04-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 3:02:35 PM
Creation date
4/7/2005 3:32:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
4/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />...:5: /. A - / <br /> <br />REPORT <br /> <br />To the Redevelopment Agency Board <br />From the Executive Director <br /> <br />April 11,2005 <br /> <br />Subject <br />Amended and Restated Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) for First <br />Community Housing's (FCH) proposal for 58-unit affordable housing project at EI <br />Camino & Vera Avenue <br /> <br />Recommendations <br />It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board ratify and approve the <br />Amended and Restated DDA. <br /> <br />Background <br />On January 24, 2005, the Redevelopment Agency Board (the "Agency") approved a <br />Disposition and Development Agreement (the "DDA") by and between the Agency and <br />First Community Housing, Inc ("FCH") for the development of a 58 unit affordable <br />housing project. Pursuant to the approved DDA, 100% of the units were required to be <br />reserved for the rental and occupancy by low to very low income households, which is <br />defined as income between 20% and 50% of Area Median Income (AMI) pursuant to <br />HUD guidelines. Unfortunately, we have recently been notified by FCH that, in light of <br />the Agency's lack of Article 34 authority, FCH will not be able to secure the additional <br />state funding needed to complete the project unless the DDA is revised to reduce the <br />number of required low to very low units. Specifically, in order to secure additional <br />public assistance,' the number of required units affordable to low to very low <br />households will need to be reduced from 100% of the units to 49%. The following <br />describes the specific revisions needed and the reasons and ramifications related <br />thereto. <br /> <br />I. Agency's Lack of Article 34 Authority <br />The Article 34 authority cited by FCH refers to Article 34 of the California Constitution <br />which provides that a low-rent housing project shall not be developed, constructed, or <br />acquired by any state public bodi until the voters of the city approve the project at an <br />election. A low-rent housing project is defined as a housing project which would be <br />affordable to persons earning 80% or less of the AMI (i.e. low or very low). Many public <br />agencies have sought voter approval of ballot measures which merely state the <br />maximum number of dwelling units a public agency may develop, construct or acquire <br />over a period of time, but do not describe the location or design of the units, the source <br /> <br />1 A redevelopment agency is a state public body as defined in Article 34 <br /> <br />SM:cje <br />Redev Shêl'edI2005 Staff ReportslO4-2005/Amended FCH DDA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.