Laserfiche WebLink
3. Approve a Five -Year Budget and a Maximum Annual Assessment; <br />4. Call for a Property Owners' Election on the Five -Year Budget and Maximum <br />Annual Assessment, and <br />5. Provide for Notice of the Election and a Public Hearing thereon. (507) <br />RESOLUTION 14644 OF INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY OF BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS <br />FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005 -2006 USING THE ALTERNATIVE METHOD, ESTABLISHING A 5- <br />YEAR BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2005 -2006 THROUGH 2009 -2010, ESTABLISHING A <br />MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR SUCH 5 -YEAR PERIOD AND A MAXIMUM <br />ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR SUCH 5 -YEAR PERIOD, APPROVING CITY MANAGER'S AND <br />ENGINEER'S REPORTS, CALLING PROPERTY OWNERS' ELECTION ON SAID BUDGET <br />AND ASSESSMENTS, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF ELECTION AND HEARING <br />THEREON — SEAPORT BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />A. Appeal of a Use Permit for High Tech High Bayshore, a public charter high <br />school proposing to locate at 890 Broadway <br />Senior Planner Jill Ekas utilized a Powerpoint presentation (on file) to present a <br />staff report on the appeal of the use permit for High Tech High. Ms. Ekas <br />presented slides depicting maps of the neighborhood and photographs of <br />sample traffic flow. Ekas presented data on the diversity of uses of different <br />buildings in the neighborhood, including several public and quasi - public uses. <br />Council requested clarification from the City Attorney that their purview as to <br />what was to be decided in a vote included only the topics of parking issues and <br />outside use. Assistant City Attorney Brower confirmed this. <br />Mayor Ira opened the public hearing. <br />Public Comment: <br />Linda Stevenin, Regional Director of High Tech High, displayed her points using <br />a Powerpoint presentation (on file). She described High Tech High's attributes, <br />and noted that its position as a Charter School allowed School Administration to <br />determine how many parking passes would be distributed to students and set <br />policies as to their use. <br />Arthur Graham, appellant, stated that he supports education and the concept of <br />charter schools, and that the appeal puts him in an awkward situation. He <br />expressed deep concern over the location of the school and potential future <br />issues between his use of his property as an industrial warehouse, and voiced <br />concern over his future ability to sell the property if the zoning variance were to <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 23, 2005 <br />PAGE 5 <br />MINUTES BOOK 60 <br />Page No. 480 <br />